Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale-Education

By D. A. Cook, Darcy A. Reed. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2015

665 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff5825cf3ecde492b9f5c905040245b17d3e4beb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Lasse Jensen
2. F. Konradsen

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Lasse Jensen
2. F. Konradsen

In Statistics and Probability

1. Lasse Jensen
2. F. Konradsen

Citations in the corpus

• Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual Reality-Based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: Systematic Review (2021, methodology): “Quality and risk of bias was assessed with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education (NOS-E), and “A Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-Randomized Studies” (ACROBAT-NRSI) [26-28].”
• A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training (2017, methodology): “In a study of 26 reviews that all used the MERSQI to assess the quality of educational research, researchers found that across the reviews the average of their overall total scores was 11.3, with a range of 8.9–15.1 (David A Cook & Reed, 2015).”