Darcy A. Reed

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2007–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 0 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom Darcy A. Reed trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. A. Cook

Who trusts Darcy A. Reed overall

  1. D. A. Cook
  2. Leisi Pei
  3. Lasse Jensen
  4. Wannisa Matcha
  5. A. V. Gaalen
  6. Ryan Brydges
  7. Hongbin Wu
  8. F. Konradsen
  9. S. Hamstra
  10. B. Zendejas

Papers from Darcy A. Reed's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Darcy A. Reed trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (Evidence report/technology assessment)
  2. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? (British medical journal)
  3. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  4. Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (PLoS Medicine)
  5. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review (Medical Teacher)
  6. A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009 (Medical Education)
  7. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  8. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  9. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity (Statistics in Medicine)
  10. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS

Their papers