Eduardo Vidal-Abarca

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2000–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 38 citations into it; #1,978 of 8,223 by trust here, #1,570 by citations
• Education — 23 citations into it; #2,871 of 11,309 by trust here, #2,726 by citations
• Artificial Intelligence — 9 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 8 citations into it; #5,099 of 9,731 by trust here, #5,545 by citations
• Literature and Literary Theory — 6 citations into it

Whom Eduardo Vidal-Abarca trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Ivar Bråten
2. Helge I. Strømsø
3. A. Graesser
4. Jean-François Rouet
5. Raquel Cerdán
6. M. A. Britt

Who trusts Eduardo Vidal-Abarca overall

1. Ivar Bråten
2. Johannes Gurlitt
3. Danielle S. McNamara
4. Jean-François Rouet
5. Helge I. Strømsø
6. Alexander Renkl
7. Shaaron E. Ainsworth
8. Rachel Best
9. Laura Gil
10. Tenaha O'Reilly

Papers from Eduardo Vidal-Abarca's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Eduardo Vidal-Abarca trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
2. Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding
3. SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training
4. Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information
5. Educational Research in the Internet Age: Examining the Role of Individual Characteristics
6. Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding
7. Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text.
8. Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts
9. Beliefs About Academic Knowledge
10. Interest, Reading, and Learning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations

Their papers

• Individual Differences for Self-Regulating Task-Oriented Reading Activities. (2010) — 157 citations
• Understanding and Integrating Multiple Science Texts: Summary Tasks are Sometimes Better Than Argument Tasks (2010) — 86 citations
• Summary versus Argument Tasks when Working with Multiple Documents: Which Is Better for Whom?. (2010) — 157 citations
• Impact of Question-Answering Tasks on Search Processes and Reading Comprehension. (2009) — 132 citations
• The Effects of Tasks on Integrating Information From Multiple Documents (2008) — 167 citations
• Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning. (2000) — 89 citations