Summary versus Argument Tasks when Working with Multiple Documents: Which Is Better for Whom?.

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts (2011, methodology): “text strategy use and comprehension performance among students reading to construct arguments in this study, is that an argument task has been considered particularly suitable for eliciting strategies that promote the comprehension of multiple texts, especially strategies in the form of deeper-level”
The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model (2011, background): “…knowledge seem to play a particularly important role when students are trying to construct arguments based on what they read (Bråten & Strømsø, 2010a; Gil et al., 2010b), with those believing more in tentative and evolving knowledge seemingly more likely to study the materials in full breadth and…”