Government Employees
By S. Frank, Gregory B. Lewis. 2004
266 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa5969ff72df0227e7e1a64e9b81c9dc387df369
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Bradley E. Wright
- Chung-an Chen
- Barry Bozeman
- Sanjay K. Pandey
- Leonard Bright
- D. Sarewitz
- Christoph Grimpe
- Monica Gaughan
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Sanjay K. Pandey
- J. Caillier
- M. Ford
- Wisanupong Potipiroon
- Bradley E. Wright
- Barry Bozeman
- Chung-an Chen
- Leonard Bright
In Public Administration
- Sanjay K. Pandey
- J. Caillier
- Wisanupong Potipiroon
- M. Ford
- Bradley E. Wright
- Barry Bozeman
- Chung-an Chen
- Leonard Bright
Citations in the corpus
- Does Public Service Motivation Always Lead to Organizational Commitment? Examining the Moderating Roles of Intrinsic Motivation and Ethical Leadership (2017, background): “Although it is true that public organizations can provide considerable opportunities for acts of altruism (Frank & Lewis, 2004) and that public employees are more likely to internalize the significance of their organizational goals and missions (Caillier, 2015; Wright & Pandey, 2011), our findings…”
- Does Family-Friendly Policy Matter? Testing Its Impact on Turnover and Performance (2011, background): “…this study focuses on quits, which are probably the most frequent designation for voluntary turnover because quits mean the loss of talented employees by the choices of employees themselves; thus, this phenomenon is very critical to the organization’s success (Price 1997; Selden and Moynihan 2000).”
- WHAT ' S VALUED MOST? SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR (2008, background): “Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. work ’ – and public service motivation ( Karl and Sutton 1998; Lewis and Frank 2002; Frank and Lewis 2004; Lyons et al. 2006 ), and the (assumed) infl uence of business-like approaches to government such as New Public Management ( Hood 1991 ), per”
- Does Person-Organization Fit Mediate the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees? (2007, background): “Unfortunately, even though Frank and Lewis (2004) found that most government employees rate their work effort highly, the literature differs on the connection that PSM has to these ratings.”
- Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person—Organization Fit (2008, methodology): “such as the employees’ desire to help others, benefit society, or engage in meaningful public service (Alonso & Lewis, 2001; Crewson, 1997; Frank & Lewis, 2004; Houston, 2000; Lewis & Frank, 2002; Rainey, 1982; Wittmer, 1991).”
- Incentives and Workers' Motivation in the Public Sector (2004, unknown): “While a welfaremaximising agency sets wm when wm=em < wl= e, a cost-minimising agency only does so when condition (16) is satis ed.”
- Understanding Public and Nonprofit Managers' Motivation Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory (2013, background): “…sector peers (Houston, 2000; Lewis and Frank, 2002; Lyons et al., 2006; Wittmer, 1991) and in some cases even stronger than their own service motivation (Frank and Lewis, 2004; Jurkiewicz et al., 1998); their desire for pay and promotion is almost as strong as that of business sector workers…”