A competency‐based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship

By James C. Hayton, Donna J. Kelley. 2006

459 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9c24d7cc32e9bebee073f1ad3f7cc714cc2e922

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation (2011, unknown): “Among the various approaches studied for analyze the competences (e.g., Bird 1995; Hayton and Kelly 2006; Mukhtar and Redman 2004), the present study has”
Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth (2015, background): “…capabilities, dynamic capabilities depend upon the investment of time, attention and resources by leaders (Bingham et al., 2007; Felin et al., 2012), and involve specific and identifiable organizational processes and resources (Hayton and Kelley, 2006; Miller, 1983; Zahra and Nielsen, 2002).”
Organizational Support for Intrapreneurship and its Interaction with Human Capital To Enhance Innovative Performance (2010, unknown): “…Human Capital HC in the form of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of the employees can contribute to the organizational competencies and performance by reducing the risks and increasing the returns from investments done in innovation and venturing (e.g., Hayton, 2005; Hayton and Kelley, 2006).”
Entrepreneurship Education And Training In A Small Business Context: Insights From The Competence-Based Approach (2008, background): “…current thinking on entrepreneurship and competencies (e.g. Sullivan, 2000; Markman and Baron, 2003; Collins et al., 2006; Fuller-Love, 2006; Hayton and Kelley, 2006; Man, 2006), the concept of competence still seems to be surrounded by confusion and ambiguity (Stoof et al., 2002;…”
Beyond Simple Utility: Incentive Design and Trade–Offs for Corporate Employee–Entrepreneurs (2010, background): “There are also a number of related human resource practices (Cardon & Stevens, 2004; Carlson, Upton, & Seaman, 2006; Hayton & Kelley, 2006; Hornsby & Kuratko, 2003; Jack, Hyman, & Osborne, 2006; Leung, Zhang, Wong, & Foo, 2006) that potentially influence entrepreneurial behavior of employees.”
The Influence of Entrepreneurs’ Credentials and Impression Management Behaviors on Perceptions of New Venture Legitimacy (2012, background): “…avenue, however, investigates the practical value that an entrepreneur’s social skills and behaviors, including persuasion, social adaptability, and impression management (IM) behaviors, can have in successfully launching a NV (Baron & Markman, 2003; Bowey & Easton, 2007; Hayton & Kelley, 2006).”
The Impact of an Entrepreneurship Education Program on Entrepreneurial Competencies and Intention* (2013, methodology): “Among the different approaches taken to analyze competencies (Bird 1995; Hayton and Kelly 2006; Mukhtar and Redman 2004), the present study has adopted the outputs approach.”
Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality (2015, background): “Topics, such as human resource practices, institutionalizing the concept of CE, environment and industry issues, control and operations management, and specific difficulties in implementation, are all examples of issues covered (Schuler 1986; Morris and Trotter 1990; Lumpkin and Dess 2001; Hayton 20”
Human resource practices and innovation in the hotel industry: The mediating role of human capital (2018, background): “For Hayton and Kelley (2006), individuals who have more resources to draw upon in the form of cognitive ability, education, training and practical experience are more likely to be innovative.”
What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis (2009, background): “The identification of these enablers should prove valuable in designing scientific selection processes around the appropriate psychological constructs, thereby providing the methodological safeguards that the experts surveyed by Schippmann et al. (2000) missed in CM. Hayton and Kelley (2006) provide”
Human Capital and Entrepreneurship Research: A Critical Review and Future Directions (2016, background): “…and entrepreneurship literature has also emphasized competencies as focused at the individual level, which represents the knowledge, skills, and personality characteristics required to motivate the implementation of these into desired outcomes (Hayton & Kelley, 2006; Man, Lau, & Chan, 2002).”
Developing a competency-based framework for teachers’ entrepreneurial behaviour (2010, background): “…on a review of the literatures of psychological entrepreneurship (e.g., Baum & Locke, 2004; Rauch & Frese, 2000), human resource management (e.g., Hayton & Kelley, 2006), and education (e.g., Biessen et al., 2005; Onstenk, 2003), and observations of practices in the field (e.g., schools' mission…”
Talent management, talent mindset competency and job performance: the mediating role of job satisfaction (2015, methodology): “feedback about competencies and the development of potential in organisations (Hayton and Kelley, 2006; McCauley and Wakefield, 2006).”