From the Editors Publishing Laboratory Research in AMJ: A Question of When, Not If
By J. Colquitt. 2008
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8e6c4f3175669fd8421892c367b26af0901a1e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Bernardo F. Quiroga
- Sirio Lonati
- Christian Zehnder
- S. Simmons
- Daniel A. Doty
- Bradley P. Owens
- Markus Baer
- Carl P. Maertz Jr.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- John Antonakis
- Michal Biron
- M. van Vugt
- Bradley P. Owens
- Terence R. Mitchell
- Carl P. Maertz Jr.
- Brian R. Spisak
- Allen Grabo
Citations in the corpus
- Designing Entrepreneurship Experiments (2017, background): “Isolating participants from their real-world environments has the advantage of reducing noise factors such as environmental influences (Colquitt, 2008).”
- A Critical Analysis of the Workplace Creativity Criterion Space (2012, background): “, and the measures of behavior (e.g., Does the experiment allow for observation of the behavior as defined?) for explaining the real-world effects (Colquitt, 2008).”
- Searching for Outcomes of Leadership: A 25-Year Review (2011, methodology): “Survey methods are not exempt from this limitation, and concern has been recently noted by several journal editors (Colquitt, 2008; Friedrich et al., 2009; Greenberg, 2007).”
- The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability (2014, background): “Great carewas taken tomaintain “psychological realism” (Colquitt, 2008) of our independent and dependent variables.”
- On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, background): “The most common concerns are that laboratory settings are artificial and unrealistic (see, e.g., Berkowitz & Donnerstein, 1982; Colquitt, 2008) and that student participants are not representative of the populations of interest (Levitt & List, 2007a, 2007b).”
- Mixing Individual Incentives and Group Incentives: Best of Both Worlds or Social Dilemma? (2011, background): “Although the lack of random selection and the potential homogeneity of our sample may raise concerns, researchers such as Dipboye and Flanagan (1979) and Colquitt (2008) note that samples in field studies typically have similar levels of homogeneity.”
- The impact of structural empowerment on individual well-being and performance: Taking agent preferences, self-efficacy and operational constraints into account (2010, background): “…that they are realistic and are structured around actual rather than hypothetical situations, simulations answer recent calls for experimental designs that are able to test causal hypotheses in ways that maximize both internal and external validity (Colquitt, 2008; Scandura and Williams, 2000).”
- Working in our sleep (2012, background): “Colquitt (2008) provides a clear review of the strengths and purposes of laboratory research.”
- Expressed Humility in Organizations: Implications for Performance, Teams, and Leadership (2013, background): “The structuring of this team project experience, and the frequent interaction it fostered, was created to provide the psychological (both mundane and experimental) realism to approximate a real project team in the work context (see Colquitt 2008).”