Designing Entrepreneurship Experiments

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research (2019, background): “Given that randomized controlled experiments are the gold standard for drawing causal inference, we join other scholars in encouraging more experimental designs—natural or laboratory—in entrepreneurship research (Hsu et al., 2017; Williams et al., 2019).”
The Resource-Based View, Resourcefulness, and Resource Management in Startup Firms: A Proposed Research Agenda (2021, background): “The preceding discussion, along with Tables 2 and 3, indicates that longitudinal and experimental designs can help us move forward in testing the alternative assumptions presented in Table 1, allowing us to address issues related to potential endogeneity (Hsu et al., 2017).”
Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study (2020, background): “Cognitive neuroscientists have shown that asking subjects to evaluate an experience/stimulus while it is ongoing interferes with the experience (Hsu, 2017).”
Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research (2019, methodology): “For instance, simplified experiments conducted using undergraduate students (or outsourced to MTurk or another service) may not be able to adequately capture the high stakes and emotions that entrepreneurs encounter in realworld situations, so their appropriateness for a particular research problem ”