Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct

By Thomas J. Kalliath, P. Brough. 2008

605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f553f944054536dd6ae30ec0229630b307130499

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. O’driscoll
2. O. Siu
3. P. Brough
4. Carolyn Timms
5. Thomas J. Kalliath
6. C. Sit
7. Danny Lo
8. M. Sirgy

In Social Psychology

1. M. O’driscoll
2. O. Siu
3. P. Brough
4. Carolyn Timms
5. Dong-Jin Lee
6. Thomas J. Kalliath
7. M. Sirgy
8. C. Sit

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. O’driscoll
2. P. Brough
3. O. Siu
4. Carolyn Timms
5. Thomas J. Kalliath
6. C. Sit
7. Danny Lo
8. Dong-Jin Lee

Citations in the corpus

• Work-Life Balance Practices in Nigeria: A Comparison of Three Sectors (2014, background): “The drivers for WLB can be attributed to changes in the demographic distribution of the labour force, technological advancement and the 24/7 opening hour’s culture in Morden society (Beauregard & Henry, 2009; Kalliath & Brough, 2008).”
• Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work–life balance (2016, background): “The second mediator is work–life balance, defined as ‘the individual perception that work and non-work activities are compatible and promote growth in accordance with an individual’s current life priorities’ (Kalliath & Brough, 2008, p. 326).”
• Organizational interventions for balancing work and home demands: An overview (2010, methodology): “We acknowledge the recent discussions which describe the numerous definitions of work-life balance commonly employed within the literature (e.g., Kalliath & Brough, 2008) and similarly, the discussions focusing on terminology: that is, work-life or work-family (e.g., Fandre, Poposki, Sinha, & Ryan,…”
• Effect of Work–Life Balance on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Role of Organizational Commitment (2016, background): “Kalliath and Brough (2008) in this connection have mentioned that ‘despite the contradiction in the definition, a large part of literature has defined work–life balance as being either the absence of work–life conflict or work–life spill over’.”
• Work–life balance: a longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers (2014, methodology): “However, Greenhaus et al.’s (2003) definition of balance as consisting of objectively equal components of time, involvement and satisfaction between multiple roles has been questioned (e.g. Kalliath and Brough 2008).”
• Work Life Balance: A Conceptual Review (2018, background): ““Work-life balance is the individual perception that work and non-work activities are compatible and promote growth in accordance with an individual’s current life priorities” [47].”
• The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work–Life Balance in Organizations: A Review of the Empirical Research (2020, background): “Due to a recent shift in workforce interests and the increasing importance of health and well-being concerns, WLB has received more attention than ever before (Kalliath & Brough, 2008).”
• Work-Life Balance: an Integrative Review (2017, background): “Individuals with work-life balance engage in multiple roles, experience satisfaction from multiple roles by effectively distributing time and effort across these roles in salient life domains (e.g., Kalliath and Brough 2008; Marks et al. 2001).”
• The Career Futures Inventory–Revised (2012, background): “Kalliath and Brough (2008) discussed six specific domains through which WLB has been conceptualized, including individuals’ holding multiple roles, feeling equality of time and involvement in their roles, finding satisfaction within roles, perceiving the importance of multiple roles, feeling…”