Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work–life balance

By X. Chan, Thomas J. Kalliath, P. Brough, O. Siu, M. O’driscoll, Carolyn Timms. 2016

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Although the direct effects of work–family enrichment on satisfaction are well-documented, previous theoretical predictions and empirical findings of the relationship have been inconsistent. Drawing on social cognitive theory, the current research examined how work–family enrichment contributes to job and family satisfaction by exploring the mediating mechanisms of self-efficacy and work–life balance. This study also empirically validated a new self-efficacy measure using the work–life interface nomological network. A heterogeneous sample of Australian employees (N = 234) from four different organisations responded to two waves of data collection separated by a 12-month interval. Using structural equation modelling, the results of the statistical analysis provided preliminary support for the hypothesised chain mediation model and the newly developed five-item self-efficacy to regulate work and life scale. Specifically, work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment were positively related to self-efficacy, which in turn had a positive effect on work–life balance. Similarly, work–life balance had a positive impact on job and family satisfaction. Evidence of these relationships over time was demonstrated, thereby emphasising the importance of person–cognitive resources (e.g. self-efficacy) in influencing life outcomes. Validation of the self-efficacy scale also demonstrated robust psychometric properties and criterion validity. Implications of these results were subsequently discussed.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d9e1b881ac0cb3b2ab9cfa3384041fe418ddc44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Chris Stride
  2. K. Strauss

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. Chris Stride
  2. J. Arnold
  3. K. Strauss
  4. C. Kelly
  5. Sharon K. Parker
  6. Arnold B. Bakker

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Chris Stride
  2. J. Arnold
  3. K. Strauss
  4. C. Kelly

Citations in the corpus