Regulatory focus at work : the moderating role of regulatory focus in the job demands-resources model
By V. Brenninkmeijer, Evangelia Demerouti, L. Blanc, van I.J.H. Emmerik. 2010
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f37c84a412be9699f0b4da33f079e8c8186902d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- François Courcy
- Anis Khedhaouria
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Francesco Montani
- Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler
- Andrea Fischbach
In General Health Professions
- François Courcy
- Anis Khedhaouria
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Francesco Montani
- Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler
- Andrea Fischbach
- Matthias Baum
- Philipp Böhnlein
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- François Courcy
- Anis Khedhaouria
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Francesco Montani
- Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler
- Andrea Fischbach
- John P. Meyer
- Sharon K. Parker
Citations in the corpus
- A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting (2018, background): “Employees in a prevention-focused mind-set focus on possible work-related non-losses (e.g., the chances of successfully avoiding strenuous job characteristics) and corresponding losses (e.g., the chances of failing in avoiding strenuous job characteristics) (Brenninkmeijer et al., 2010).”
- Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness (2020, background): “Some studies have shown that personal resources may buffer the relationship between job demands and work engagement (e.g. Brenninkmeijer et al., 2010).”
- Heavy work investment: Its motivational make-up and outcomes (2013, unknown): “(2002), and translated and adapted to the work situation by Brenninkmeijer et al. (2010) prevention focus was measured with nine items (a 1⁄4 0.”