A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting

By Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler, Andrea Fischbach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2018

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to present a meta-analytical summary of the job crafting literature. We integrate resource- and role-based job crafting conceptualizations in one job crafting model, which can theoretically account for beneficial and detrimental job crafting effects. Applying reasoning from regulatory focus theory we differentiated promotion-focused (increasing job resources and challenging job demands; expansion-oriented task, relational, and cognitive crafting) from prevention-focused (decreasing hindering job demands; contraction-oriented task and relational crafting) job crafting. We hypothesized that promotion-focused job crafting relates positively and prevention-focused job crafting relates negatively with employee health, motivation, and performance. Results of cross-sectional meta-analytical structural equation modelling showed that promotion-focused job crafting was positively related with work engagement and negatively related with burnout, while prevention-focused job crafting was negatively related with work engagement and positively related with burnout. Moreover, promotion-focused job crafting was positively and prevention-focused job crafting was negatively related with performance through work engagement and burnout. Results of longitudinal meta-analytical structural equation modelling showed that there were reciprocal, positive relationships between promotion-focused job crafting and work engagement, and between prevention-focused job crafting and burnout. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c82769b566bcb0c2919240ef2e30db2fd09dd8a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

  1. J. Hakanen
  2. Sharon K. Parker
  3. M. Tims
  4. Matthias Baum
  5. Philipp Böhnlein
  6. Arnold B. Bakker
  7. T. Beehr
  8. Minseop Kim

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. Arnold B. Bakker
  2. T. Beehr
  3. Minseop Kim
  4. M. Tims
  5. J. Hakanen
  6. Sharon K. Parker
  7. Matthias Baum
  8. Philipp Böhnlein

In Social Psychology

  1. Arnold B. Bakker
  2. Minseop Kim
  3. Sharon K. Parker
  4. T. Beehr
  5. J. Hakanen
  6. M. Tims
  7. Matthias Baum
  8. Philipp Böhnlein

Citations in the corpus