Jonathan A. Shaffer

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2007–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 34 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Jonathan A. Shaffer trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Huy Le
  2. Mark G. Ehrhart
  3. Timothy A. Brown
  4. S. Rothmann
  5. Frank L. Schmidt
  6. Robert E. Ployhart
  7. Oliver P. John
  8. Howard E. A. Tinsley
  9. Timothy R. Hinkin
  10. G. Yukl

Who trusts Jonathan A. Shaffer overall

  1. Tamara L. Giluk
  2. Mikko Rönkkö
  3. Chak Fu Lam
  4. Bennett E. Postlethwaite
  5. Herman Aguinis
  6. Neal Schmitt
  7. Jesús Salgado
  8. Ernest H. O’Boyle
  9. Gretchen M. Spreitzer
  10. Eunseong Cho

Papers from Jonathan A. Shaffer's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jonathan A. Shaffer trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  2. LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS
  3. Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. Conceptual Versus Empirical Distinctions Among Constructs: Implications for Discriminant Validity (Industrial and Organizational Psychology)
  5. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing
  6. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  7. Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  8. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  9. What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications
  10. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.

Their papers