A matter of context: A meta‐analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures.
By Jonathan A. Shaffer, Bennett E. Postlethwaite. 2012
249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b83205101ed31a6d3d4e436cbf598bc0c7689f9e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Tamara L. Giluk
- Chak Fu Lam
- Gretchen M. Spreitzer
- C. Fritz
- Neal Schmitt
- Blaine Landis
- Ilan Dar-Nimrod
- Zhen Zhang
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Chak Fu Lam
- Gretchen M. Spreitzer
- Herman Aguinis
- Neal Schmitt
- Ruolian Fang
- Tamara L. Giluk
- C. Fritz
- J. Mackey
Citations in the corpus
- Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear effect of positive affect on proactive behaviors (2014, methodology): “We assessed positive affect at work using Ryan and Frederick’s (1997) seven-item measure of subjective vitality, adding the phrase “at work” to the end of each item (Shaffer & Postlethwaite, 2012).”
- Teacher Personality and Teacher Effectiveness in Secondary School: Personality Predicts Teacher Support and Student Self-Efficacy but Not Academic Achievement (2017, background): “When predicting workplace performance, work-contextualized personality assessments show fewer errors of measurement (Robie, Schmit, Ryan, & Zickar, 2000) and stronger prediction of performance (Shaffer & Postlethwaite, 2012).”
- Big five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. (2015, methodology): “The five-factor model has been widely used to predict both academic performance (Poropat, 2009) and job performance (Shaffer & Postlethwaite, 2012).”
- Measuring Cultural Competencies: The Development and Validation of a Revised Measure of Sociocultural Adaptation (2017, unknown): “Black et al.’s (1991) widely accepted tripartite framework of international adjustment (e.g., Caligiuri, 2000; Selmer & Leung, 2003; Shaffer & Postlethwaite, 2012; Templer, Tay, & Chandrasekar, 2006) added “general adjustment” (e.g., food, living conditions) to “interactional” and “work” adjustment.”
- Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work (2014, background): “Most convincing of the importance of context is a meta-analysis by Shaffer & Postlethwaite (2012).”
- Best Practices in Data Collection and Preparation: Recommendations for Reviewers, Editors, and Authors (2019, background): “Another example of best practices regarding corrections is from Shaffer and Postlethwaite (2012) in their meta-analysis to compare the validities of general noncontextualized personality measures and work-specific contextualized measures.”
- Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision (2015, background): “Several meta-analyses have demonstrated a significant negative relationship between neuroticism and task performance (e.g., Hurtz and Donovan 2000; Judge et al. 2013; Mount et al. 1998; Shaffer and Postlethwaite 2012).”
- Integrating Personality and Social Networks: A Meta-Analysis of Personality, Network Position, and Work Outcomes in Organizations (2015, background): “2006) and “contextualized” measures of personality (Shaffer and Postlethwaite 2012) could have incremental predictive power over and above self-monitoring and the broad Big Five traits examined here.”