Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms' financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects
By Ernest H. O’Boyle, J. Pollack, Matthew W. Rutherford. 2012
308 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe368324877ebf2aa6496a231f0c2ee2e75d2a95
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Nadine H. Kammerlander
- Thomas M. Zellweger
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Ines Herrero
- L. Stanley
- Alfredo De Massis
- Andreas König
- Albrecht Enders
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Nadine H. Kammerlander
- Thomas M. Zellweger
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Ines Herrero
- L. Stanley
- Andreas König
- Albrecht Enders
- Robert J. Boncella
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Thomas M. Zellweger
- Nadine H. Kammerlander
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Ines Herrero
- L. Stanley
- Alfredo De Massis
- Andreas König
- Albrecht Enders
Citations in the corpus
- Latent Profile Analysis (2017, background): “This suggests that it is important to consider the pattern of variables and may explain nonfinding in the current literature (Carney et al., 2014; O’Boyle et al., 2012).”
- Family Firm(s) Outcomes Model: Structuring Financial and Nonfinancial Outcomes Across the Family and Firm (2017, methodology): “…notable exceptions (e.g., Danes, Stafford, Haynes, & Amarapurkar, 2009), the financial outcomes specific to the family (e.g., income and other financial assets like real estate) have largely been overlooked (O’Boyle et al., 2012), although family business researchers often allude to family wealth.”
- The Family Innovator's Dilemma: How Family Influence Affects the Adoption of Discontinuous Technologies by Incumbent Firms (2013, background): “Scholars in this field have long sought to identify whether family influence is a benefit or a burden for businesses (O’Boyle et al., 2012), but with equivocal results.”
- The relationship between innovation, knowledge, and performance in family and non-family firms: an analysis of SMEs (2013, background): “In a meta-analysis by O’Boyle et al. (2012), they found that family firms may indeed have a disadvantage when compared to family firms.”
- How Familial Is Family Social Capital? Analyzing Bonding Social Capital in Family and Nonfamily Firms (2018, result): “Although it has not been assessed relative to FSC, ROA is the performance measure most often used in family firm studies, and our results with regard to ROA are consistent with a recent meta-analysis (O’Boyle et al., 2012) that showed no relationship between ROA and family involvement.”
- Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, unknown): “Since our constructs of interest are usually reported as a continuum, we provide correlations (r c) rather than standardized differences (ԁ) (O’Boyle et al., 2012).”
- Empirics in Family Business Research (2016, background): “Indeed, O’Boyle et al. (2012) advanced the field toward a potential resolution of the debate focused on family versus nonfamily financial performance.”
- Doing More with Less: Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms (2016, unknown): “First, we consulted several review and meta-analytic articles, such as a narrative review on innovation in family firms (e.g., De Massis et al., 2013) and a published meta-analysis on family firms and firm performance (O ’ Boyle, Pollack, & Rutherford, 2012).”