MY JOB IS MY CASTLE: IDENTIFICATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXTS

By Rolf van Dick. 2005

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0b9c7600285a5f48fdd8cb316218b5252e0c2f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Gender Studies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Leadership and Change Management Strategy on Organizational Culture and Individual Acceptance of Change during a Merger (2006, background): “Van Knippenberg and Hogg (2003) and van Dick (2004) argue that in high salience groups with which people identify strongly, leadership effectiveness is significantly influenced by how prototypical of the group the leader is perceived to be by the members.”
Your Place or Mine? Organizational Identification and Comfort as Mediators of Relationships Between the Managerial Control of Workspace and Employees' Satisfaction and Well-being (2010, background): “…(in the way that social identity researchers suggest; e.g. Ellemers, de Gilder and Haslam, 2004; Haslam, 2004; Tyler and Blader, 2000; Van Dick, 2004), then closer interrogation of the Space and Organizational Identification 731 r 2010 British Academy of Management. received wisdom…”
The downside of organizational identification: Relations between identification, workaholism and well-being (2012, background): “In the organizational context, this means that employees can identify, for instance, with their careers, with different units within their organization (e.g. work groups), or with the organization as a whole (van Dick, 2004).”
Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction (2015, methodology): “In a meta-analysis by Riketta and van Dick (2005), attachment and identification with the workgroup was found to be stronger than attachment and identification with the organization, possibly due to the more proximal nature of the workgroup.”
SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS (2006, background): “…these deficiencies and trying to improve them—while the latter would arguably be more desirable from an organizational point of view (Ellemers et al., 1998; see also Christ, van Dick, Wagner, & Stellmacher, 2003; Riketta & van Dick, in press; van Dick, 2004; van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000).”
Work motivation, organisational identification, and well-being in call centre work (2006, background): “In sum, we found strong evidence in both samples for a model that conceptualises motivating forces linked to the task and those forces that are linked to the social identity of employees and self-categorisation processes as rather independent from each other (see Van Dick & Wegge, 2004, for a detail”
Effects of team and organizational commitment – A longitudinal study (2010, background): “…commitment and outcomes, such as performance, is weak (Cohen, 1991; Mathieu & Zajac, 1990; Randall, 1990; Riketta, 2002), because the assessment of attitudes such as organizational commitment and behavior (e.g., OCB) is too general and does not refer to specific foci (Riketta & Van Dick, 2005).”
Identity and identification at work (2016, background): “…have been published on the topic of work identity and identification in the last decade (e.g., Alvesson, Ashcraft, & Thomas, 2008; Ashforth, Harrison, & Corley, 2008; Brown, 2015; Haslam & Ellemers, 2005; Ramarajan, 2014; van Dick, 2004; van Knippenberg, van Knippenberg, De Cremer, & Hogg, 2004).”
Individual‐ and group‐level effects of social identification on workplace bullying (2013, background): “…have demonstrated relationships between group and organizational identification and positive organizational outcomes such as perfor- mance, cooperation, extrarole behaviour, and job satisfaction (for reviews, see Ashforth, Harrison, & Corley, 2008; Haslam, 2004; Riketta, 2005; van Dick, 2004).”