Learner Empowerment and Teacher Evaluations as Functions of Teacher Power Use in the College Classroom

By Paul Schrodt, Paul L. Witt, S. Myers, Paul D. Turman, M. Barton, Kodiane A. Jernberg. 2008

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed121c714cd7c3bc650d50da93084aceb854c58a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Coercive and Supportive Teacher Behaviour: Within- and across-Lesson Associations with the Classroom Social Climate. (2011, unknown): “This finding is in contrast to more general theories on interpersonal power (French & Raven, 1959; Schrodt et al., 2008) which assume that coercive behaviour enhances interpersonal influence.”
Are Choice-Making Opportunities Needed in the Classroom? Using Self-Determination Theory to Consider Student Motivation and Learner Empowerment. (2011, background): “Feelings of control, while tied to both empowerment and motivation, are what distinguish learner empowerment from other related concepts (Schrodt et al., 2008).”
Positive teacher–student relationships go beyond the classroom, problematic ones stay inside (2017, unknown): “…(Andersen, 1998), teacher empathy (Cornelius-White, 2007), and teacher care (Wentzel, 1997) Teacher agency, on the other hand, encompasses constructs such as in ﬂ uence (Wubbels, Brekelmans, den Brok, & van Tartwijk, 2006), authority (Pace & Hemmings, 2007), and power (Schrodt et al., 2008).”
Agency as a fourth aspect of students engagement during learning activities (2011, background): “The literature on student–teacher negotiations of classroom power is also related (e.g., Schrodt et al., 2008; Sproston, 2008), as the basic principle of negotiated power is that students need to be allowed by teachers to negotiate various aspects of the classroom curriculum and decision-making,…”
College Teacher Misbehaviors: Direct and Indirect Effects on Student Communication Behavior and Traditional Learning Outcomes (2009, background): “Schrodt et al. (2008) suggested that although instructor coercive power use was not directly related to learner empowerment, it was directly related to teacher evaluations.”