The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation

By Matthew W. Ohland, Misty L. Loughry, D. Woehr, Lisa G. Bullard, Richard M. Felder, Cynthia J. Finelli, Richard A. Layton, Hal Pomeranz, D. Schmucker. 2012

504 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ece5d17034c7c67cc7f4ece1c28fe7f7332637d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2020, background): “More recently, Ohland et al. (2012) advanced five competencies as well: commitment, focus, communication, high standards, and having relevant KSAs.”
Social Loafing Tendencies and Team Performance: The Compensating Effect of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (2014, methodology): “Related to this, an on-line system, CATME TeamMaker, can be used to compose teams based on a variety of criteria, such as availability of team members, grade-point average, and level of commitment (Layton, Loughry, Ohland, & Ricco, 2010; Ohland et al., 2012).”
Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools (2014, background): “Familiarizing students with the peer-evaluation instrument before they begin working in teams shows students what team-member behaviors are expected and what behaviors are to be avoided and can help teams develop shared expectations for team members (Ohland et al., 2012).”
A Review of Competency‐Based Learning: Tools, Assessments, and Recommendations (2017, methodology): “For example, Ohland et al. (2012) outlined the development of a web-based instrument for measuring the contributions of team members as a way of measuring team-work skills.”
Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills (2014, background): “Each member then receives a summary of that feedback with research-supported suggestions for how they can specifically improve (eg CATME; www.catme.org; Ohland et al. 2012), and the team can collectively review future needs for best results.”
Justifying Aggregation With Consensus-Based Constructs (2015, methodology): “These data were collected using the online CATME Peer Evaluation system (Ohland et al., 2012).”
Assessing teamwork in undergraduate education: a measurement tool to evaluate individual teamwork skills (2017, background): “The instrument is intended to clarify expectations for students, and provide meaningful feedback for students and instructors on team member performance, in order to reduce the confusion surrounding assessment (Ohland et al. 2012).”