Accounts of workplace bullying: The role of the organization
By A. Liefooghe, KateKenzie Mac Davey. 2001
284 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e89aa0c14d98b86573407ba8aff63d8dea84038b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Staale Einarsen
- Nicole J. Saam
- S. B. Matthiesen
- Dieter Zapf
- J. Escartín
- Stefan Thau
- M. B. Nielsen
- Karl Aquino
Citations in the corpus
- Workers' perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study (2011, background): “It has been argued that power distance is a crucial variable (Liefooghe & Mackenzie-Davey, 2001) and that strong hierarchical relations make workplace bullying behaviours more likely to arise.”
- Interventions in workplace bullying: A multilevel approach (2010, background): “…2001; Hogh & Dofradottir, 2001; Leymann, 1996; Leymann & Gustafsson, 1996 [Leymann conducted several studies in the late 1980s and early 1990s]; Liefooghe & Davey, 2001; Salin, 2003b; Zapf, 1999), as well as methods of measuring workplace bullying (for an overview see Cowie, Naylor, Smith,…”
- Workplace Bullying: Causes, Consequences, and Corrections (2010, unknown): “Organizational-bullying indicts organizational practices that are oppressive, exploitive, and over-controlling as seeding abuse (Liefooghe & MacKenzieDavey, 2001) (e.g., corporate downsizing, outsourcing jobs, forcing uncompensated overtime work, closing entire plants to relocate for low-cost…”
- Workplace bullying as an antecedent to job insecurity and intention to leave: a 6‐month prospective study (2014, background): “Human Resource Management Journal Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Interestingly, in another qualitative study, employees were found to apply the term ‘bullying’ to organisational threats of dismissal, of being replaced by machines and becoming redundant (Liefooghe and Davey, 2001).”
- The exit coping response to workplace bullying (2010, background): “Empirical research so far demonstrates organizational antecedents in terms of the work-environment hypothesis (see, for example, Hoel and Salin, 2003) and the organization as bully (see for example D’Cruz and Noronha, 2009a; Liefooghe and Mackenzie-Davey, 2001).”
- Managers in the firing line: Contributing factors to workplace bullying by staff – an interview study (2007, background): “Indeed, staff may actually be using the term bullying as a weapon against management (Einarsen, 1999) as a way of voicing their dissatisfaction with organizational issues and the work environment, as proposed by Liefooghe and Davey (2001).”
- Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective. (2009, background): “A number of investigators have argued that victimization can undermine employees’ self-esteem (Björkvist et al. 1994, Lee & Brotheridge 2006, Liefooghe & Davey 2001, Tepper 2000), but like the other personality variables reviewed, the causal direction of the self-esteem-victimization relationship…”
- Workplace bullying: a cross‐level assessment (2006, background): “By not taking action, the organization vie top management may through silence “legitimize” and thus “institutionalize” bullying (Ashforth, 1994; Liefooghe and Davey, 2001).”