COMPARISON OF SITUATIONAL AND BEHAVIOR DESCRIPTION INTERVIEW QUESTIONS FOR HIGHER‐LEVEL POSITIONS

By Allen I. Huffcutt, Jeff A. Weekley, W. Wiesner, T. DeGroot, Casey Jones. 2001

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7cfd78bfa0ba44c6553ddab7ae9e5340dcf822d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Kammeyer-Mueller
2. J. Levashina
3. Filip Lievens
4. Allen I. Huffcutt
5. Philip L. Roth
6. T. Judge
7. P. Sackett
8. Michael A. Campion

In Social Psychology

1. J. Kammeyer-Mueller
2. Filip Lievens
3. Philip L. Roth
4. J. Levashina
5. Allen I. Huffcutt
6. T. Judge
7. Chad H. Van Iddekinge
8. P. Sackett

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Levashina
2. J. Kammeyer-Mueller
3. T. Judge
4. Filip Lievens
5. Philip L. Roth
6. P. Sackett
7. Michael A. Campion
8. J. Conway

Citations in the corpus

• Personality and career success (2007, background): “Some research has suggested that success in situational interviews is less related to extroversion (r ˆ = .01) than success in behavioral interviews (r ˆ = .30) (Huffcutt, Weekley, Wiesner, Degroot, & Jones, 2001).”
• Personnel selection. (2008, background): “…of intercorrelations among specific predictors, including interview-cognitive ability and interviewpersonality relationships (Cortina et al. 2000; Huffcutt et al. 2001b), cognitive ability-situational judgment test relationships (McDaniel et al. 2001), and personality-situational judgment tests…”
• Antecedents of Impression Management Use and Effectiveness in a Structured Interview† (2007, result): “This finding may help account for the relationships between personality and interview ratings found in prior research (e.g., Cortina, Goldstein, Payne, Davison, & Gilliland, 2000; Huffcutt et al., 2001; Roth et al., 2005).”
• The Impact of Job Complexity and Study Design on Situational and Behavior Description Interview Validity (2004, background): “Similarly, in an analysis of retail district managers, Huffcutt et al. (2001) found considerably higher validity for the behavior description portion than for the situational portion.”
• Verbal and Nonverbal Impression Management Tactics in Behavior Description and Situational Interviews (2006, background): “, Huffcutt et al., 2001). In Pulakos and Schmitt (1995), the average SI time was approximately 45 min, whereas a BDI took about 60 min.”
• A Model of Faking Likelihood in the Employment Interview. (2006, background): “Moreover, some research shows that situational interviews are less effective with higher-level positions, while behavior description interviews retain their effectiveness (e.g., Huffcutt et al., 2001; Pulakos & Schmitt, 1995).”