The Impact of Job Complexity and Study Design on Situational and Behavior Description Interview Validity

By Allen I. Huffcutt, J. Conway, Philip L. Roth, Ute‐Christine Klehe. 2004

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8145d468ec9699083d353a22e17d0f462c000f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. J. Levashina
2. F. Morgeson
3. T. Macan
4. Chad H. Van Iddekinge
5. M. Campion
6. Christopher J. Hartwell
7. Lynn A. McFarland
8. Adam M. Grant

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. T. Macan
2. J. Levashina

In Sociology and Political Science

1. T. Macan
2. J. Levashina
3. M. Campion
4. Lynn A. McFarland
5. Christopher J. Hartwell
6. F. Morgeson
7. Chad H. Van Iddekinge
8. Nicolas Roulin

Citations in the corpus

• The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research (2009, background): “Taylor and Small's (2002) meta-analysis found no support for job complexity as a moderator, while Huffcutt et al.'s (2004) meta-analysis found job complexity to be a moderator of the validity for situational interviews, with less prediction for high complex jobs.”
• Antecedents of Impression Management Use and Effectiveness in a Structured Interview† (2007, background): “Furthermore, studies have suggested that BDI questions often are more valid than SI questions (Huffcutt et al., 2004).”
• The Structured Employment Interview: Narrative and Quantitative Review of the Research Literature (2014, methodology): “For example, Levashina and Campion (2007) hypothesized that probing would be a response verification mechanism that would inhibit faking but found that probing actually increased faking in both SQs and PBQs. Informal debriefing with applicants revealed that probing was perceived as a cue signaling w”