The role of justice and social exchange relationships in workplace deviance: Test of a mediated model

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (2013, background): “As another example, few studies have examined trust, commitment, POS, or LMX as mediators of the justice–CWB relationship (for an exception, see El Akremi et al., 2010).”
Narcissistic leadership and behavioral cynicism in the hotel industry: the role of employee silence and negative workplace gossiping (2020, background): “Moreover, other characteristics of the narcissistic leader, such as an expansive self-concept, self-importance, superiority, lack of empathy and grandiosity (O’Reilly and Doerr, 2020), can negatively affect social exchange relationships (El Akremi et al., 2010).”
Mirror, mirror on my boss’s wall: Engaged enactment’s moderating role on the relationship between perceived narcissistic supervision and work outcomes (2012, background): “…(Campbell, Bonacci et al., 2004; Hochwarter and Thompson 339 Campbell, Goodie et al., 2004), lack of consideration (Brown and Bosson, 2001), and unpredictable mood swings associated with narcissistic leadership (Rhodewalt and Morf, 1998) weakens social exchange ties (El Akremi et al., 2010).”
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies (2017, background): “The recipient’s initial motivation may be to retaliate with high deviance (e.g., El Akremi et al., 2010; Holtz & Harold, 2013; Mitchell & Ambrose, 2007; Zoghbi Manrique de Lara, 2006).”