Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007-2004.

By Harold Pashler, Patrice M. Bain, B. Bottge, A. Graesser, K. Koedinger, Mark A. McDaniel, Janet Metcalfe. 2007

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbe9a29498373e0d9736ec56dfcbeab90ce40d3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Stupid Tutoring Systems, Intelligent Humans (2016, background): “And there’s a long tradition of distilling educational research into guidelines for practice and design (Bransford et al. 1999; Koedinger et al. 2012a; Pashler et al. 2007; Clark and Mayer 2003).”
Using Systematic Instruction and Graphic Organizers to Teach Science Concepts to Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disability (2013, background): “In an Institute of Education Sciences (IES) practice guide report, Pashler et al. (2007) suggested that there is a moderate level of evidence to support the use of graphics used in combination with verbal descriptions to promote student learning.”
Retrieval Practice & Bloom’s Taxonomy: Do Students Need Fact Knowledge Before Higher Order Learning? (2019, background): “…identified robust strategies for enhancing students’ fact learning and transfer of knowledge, including retrieval practice, spaced practice, and interleaving (Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, & Willingham, 2013; McDaniel, Roediger, & McDermott, 2007; Pashler et al., 2007; Rohrer & Pashler, 2010).”
Elementary Teachers' Learning to Construct High-Quality Mathematics Lesson Plans (2013, methodology): “This study reports an attempt to use IES-recommended instructional principles (Pashler et al., 2007) to support elementary teachers’ learning as they construct highquality mathematics lesson plans.”
Design-Based Research Within the Constraints of Practice: AlgebraByExample (2015, methodology): “The test consisted of 10 algebra-related released items taken from the five standardized tests used by the participating districts: Ohio Achievement Test—Grade 8 (3 items; Ohio Department of Education, 2006); Standards of Learning Test—Grade 8 Mathematics (1 86 BOOTH ET AL. item; Virginia Department”
Book reading and vocabulary development: A systematic review (2016, background): “This pattern of results is congruent with cognitive principles (Pashler et al., 2007), suggesting that children learn the content that they have explicit opportunities to rehearse and practice (i.”