Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers' Identity Narratives
By Aaron C. Ahuvia. 2005
1,293 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7cb6006117f5a708610631c0b83149ac7ef929c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Sameer Hosany
- Marc Fetscherin
- Girish Prayag
- Chao-Chin Huang
- A. Ismail
- Thomas P. Novak
- Donna L. Hoffman
- E. Wallace
In Social Psychology
- Richard P. Bagozzi
- Sameer Hosany
- Stefano Puntoni
- Marc Fetscherin
- William Sun
- Thomas P. Novak
- Donna L. Hoffman
- Nicolas Kervyn
In Sociology and Political Science
- Sameer Hosany
- Marc Fetscherin
- Girish Prayag
- Aaron C. Ahuvia
- Chao-Chin Huang
- Richard P. Bagozzi
- A. Ismail
- S. Deesilatham
Citations in the corpus
- Brand Love (2012, background): “In consumer research, Shimp and Madden (1988) adapt Sternberg’s (1986) triangular theory of interpersonal love from psychology, and Ahuvia (1993) performs the first major empirical study.”
- Identity-Based Consumer Behavior (2012, background): “A corollary of this idea is that the more identity-related possessions a consumer has, the more empowered a consumer should feel about his ability to perform in that identity (Ahuvia, 2005) and the more confident the consumer will be that he holds appropriate opinions (Jones & Gerard, 1967).”
- Attachment–Aversion (AA) Model of Customer–Brand Relationships (2013, background): “, 2005) and brand love (Ahuvia, 2005; Batra et al., 2012).”
- Toward a theory of ethical consumer intention formation: re-extending the theory of planned behavior (2019, background): “Consumers are most likely to favor products if they believe that the products will maintain, reaffirm, extend, and promote their personal and social identities in relation to morality (Ahuvia 2005; Arnould and Thompson 2005; Belk 1988).”
- What type of relationship do we have with loved brands (2014, background): “…and Chestnut, 1978), brand trust (Chaudhuri and Holbrook, 2001), brand attachment (Belaid and Behi, 2011; Park et al., 2010), brand passion (Bauer et al., 2004), brand romance (Patwardhan and Balasubramanian, 2011), brand tribalism (Veloutsou and Moutinho, 2009), and brand love (Ahuvia, 2005).”
- Brand passion: Antecedents and consequences (2013, background): “Because brands have important meaning for consumers (Ahuvia, 2005a; Wallendorf & Arnould, 1988), switching brands implies a loss of associated meaning.”
- Brands as Relationship Partners: Warmth, Competence, and In-Between (2012, neutral): “A third and related dimension for consideration is evidenced by the work of Ahuvia (2005). Initially set-up to investigate the psychology of love in consumption contexts, Ahuvia’s research found that identity issues were central to consumers’ experiences with loved objects and brands.”
- The role of aesthetic taste in consumer behavior (2012, background): “In consumer behavior, it has been widely recognized that individuals use consumption objects to express their individual and social identity to their environment (e.g., Ahuvia 2005; Laverie et al. 2002 ;R ichins1994; Rindfleisch et al. 2009; Sirgy 1982).”
- Consumer-Retailer Emotional Attachment: Some Antecedents and the Moderating Role of Attachment Anxiety (2010, neutral): “Enriching one’s self relates to self-actualization, discovering one’s true preferences and representing the self to both oneself and others (Ahuvia, 2005).”