Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully Victim Questionnaire

By Mona E. Solberg, D. Olweus. 2003

1,843 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Insect Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c54d89eb904f9c578fc3ef49bcd55323decf35c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Insect Science

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Social Support as a Moderator Between Victimization and Internalizing–Externalizing Distress From Bullying (2007, background): “Much research has focused on the definition and outcomes of both bullies and victims (Espelage & Swearer, 2003; Solberg & Olweus, 2003).”
The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised in a representative sample (2013, methodology): “In relation to bullying in both working life (Einarsen & Skogstad, 1996) and in school (Solberg & Olweus, 2003), ‘‘now and then’’ is deemed to be the lower cutoff point for bullying when employing the self-labelling method.”
Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school (2005, background): “Dan Olweus (1991), who established bullying among school children as a research area, distinguishes two major roles (Solberg & Olweus, 2003): The victim role comprises a child who is bullied sometimes, once or more a week, over a time period of at least 3 months.”
Concurrent Validity of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (2009, methodology): “The standard cut-off recommended by Solberg and Olweus (2003) seemed to be too stringent for classifying bullies in our sample.”
Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? (2008, background): “…Rivers & Smith, 1994; Roland, 1989; Smith et al., 1999; Solberg & Olweus, 2003; Whitney & Smith, 1993) and that boys are bullied more often than girls (Austin & Joseph, 1996; Boulton & Underwood, 1992; Kumpulainen et al., 1998; Rigby, 2000; Rigby & Slee, 1999; Roland, 2002; Solberg & Olweus, 2003).”
Bullies, aggressive victims, and victims: Are they distinct groups? (2005, methodology): “To measure the student’s group affiliation, the Olweus questionnaire, which has been used in several other studies and in a number of different cultural contexts, was adapted [Olweus, 2001; Pepler et al., 1993; Smith, 1999; Smith et al., 2002; Solberg and Olweus, 2003; Unnever and Cornell, 2003a, 20”
Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study (2012, methodology): “The questionnaire was developed by the authors, partly following the Olweus Bully/Victim questionnaire, which has shown discriminant and construct validity (Solberg & Olweus, 2003 ).”
Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? (2012, methodology): “…very much as expected and quite similar to what was found in our previous analyses of the relation between a scale of Global Negative Self-Evaluations (Alsaker & Olweus, 1986) partly built on Rosenberg’s scale, and the global question of being bullied in traditional ways (Solberg & Olweus, 2003).”
Relations among school connectedness, hope, life satisfaction, and bully victimization (2008, methodology): “The use of the frequency of two to three times or more a month of victimization for the Bullied Victims group followed recommendations made by Solberg and Olweus (2003).”
‘I h8 u’: Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying (2010, methodology): “For this study we used a short version of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire, which has been shown to have both construct and discriminant validity in terms of prevalence estimation (see Solberg & Olweus, 2003 ).”
Examining Variation in Attitudes toward Aggressive Retaliation and Perceptions of Safety among Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims (2008, background): “Response options were not at all, once a month, 2–3 times during the month, once a week, and several times a week (Nansel et al., 2001; Solberg & Olweus, 2003).”