‘I h8 u’: Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying

By I. Rivers, Nathalie Noret. 2010

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/926735536d49e252e1c06b930a811d7596f2888c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “…and the perpetration of cyberbullying, it is hardly surprising that involvement in traditional bullying also appears to be related to involvement in cyberbullying (Hemphill et al., 2012; Rivers & Noret, 2010; Twyman et al., 2010; Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2009; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004a).”
Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study (2012, background): “…of research into the phenomena of cyberbullying, various issues have been discussed such as prevalence rates (e.g., Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007; Rivers & Noret, 2010), gender (Tokunaga, 2010) and age (Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004) differences, links between traditional bullying and cyberbullying…”
Moral Disengagement Among Bystanders to School Bullying (2011, background): “Other, more narrow definitions view bystanders as those who only witness bullying without active support or intervention, while children holding dual roles (eg, victim-bystanders) are not considered pure bystanders ( Rivers & Noret, 2010 ).”
Cross-Cultural Differences in Cyberbullying Behavior (2014, result): “Although the questionnaires used to assess cyberbullying differs (and clearly impacts frequency rates; Rivers & Noret, 2010), cyberbullying has been observed in several studies conducted with samples from the United States (e.g., Patchin & Hinduja, 2006), Canada (e.g., Beran & Li, 2006), China…”
A Comparison of Preservice Teachers’ Responses to Cyber Versus Traditional Bullying Scenarios (2014, background): “…is especially important to find out more about preservice teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning cyber bullying due to lack of data, lack of direct comparisons with traditional bullying, and the evidence that an increasing number of pupils are involved in cyber bullying (Rivers & Noret, 2010).”
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “…(e.g., Calvete, Orue, Estévez, Villardón, & Padilla, 2010; Fanti, Demetriou, & Hawa, 2012; Salmivalli & Pöyhönen, 2012); few or no significant differences (e.g., Smith et al., 2008; Livingstone, Haddon, Görzig, & Ólafsson, 2011); and girls being more involved than boys (e.g., Rivers & Noret, 2010).”
Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. (2012, unknown): “Prevalence rates of cyberbullying range from 4% to 36% (depending on the specific questionnaire used by researchers; see Rivers & Noret, 2010).”
Perceptions of School Climate as a Function of Bullying Involvement (2014, background): “Some studies have found girls to be more involved in cyberbullying (Rivers & Noret, 2010), whereas others have found boys to be more involved (Erdur-Baker, 2010; Slonje & Smith, 2008).”
Cyberbullying: Challenges and opportunities for a research program—A response to Olweus (2012) (2012, background): “TB appears to vary substantially between the school setting and the workplace setting; but CB occurs in cyberspace, whatever age group is taking part (Sevcikova & Smahel, 2009 ).”
Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice (2013, background): “…& Patchin (2012a) claim that the rate of cyberbullying has not increased since it first emerged as a problem in the middle of the last decade, other researchers (e.g. Cassidy, Brown, & Jackson, 2011; Kowalski et al., 2012a; Rivers & Noret, 2010) have found an increase over the past five years.”
A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: a follow-up after six years (2012, background): “This has increased considerably over the period 2002–2005, although levelling off after that (Rivers & Noret, 2010).”
Is school bullying really on the rise? (2011, background): “ Rivers and Noret (2010) provided data that suggests that the prevalence of cyber bullying increased, but then levelled off, in England.”
Anonymously hurting others online: The effect of anonymity on cyberbullying frequency. (2015, unknown): “T hi s ar tic le is in te nd ed so le ly fo r th e pe rs on al us e of th e in di vi du al us er an d is no t to be di ss em in at ed br oa dl y. Rivers and Noret (2010), such diversity in measures is one (of several) reason why CB frequency percentages vary from study to study.”