The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal

By Andy Lockett, S. Thompson, Uta Morgenstern. 2009

688 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c500ca0db00448fcacca7e8325f45b3ac908b897

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Deniz Ucbasaran
2. Aard J. Groen
3. Andy Lockett
4. James C. Hayton
5. Richard L. Priem
6. G. Hodgkinson
7. J. Carr
8. Rıfat Kamaşak

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Richard L. Priem
2. K. Mole
3. Deniz Ucbasaran
4. E. Parry
5. Andy Lockett
6. James C. Hayton
7. Oksana Koryak
8. G. Hodgkinson

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Carr
2. Sali Li
3. Richard L. Priem
4. Andy Lockett
5. K. Mole
6. Deniz Ucbasaran
7. Aard J. Groen
8. E. Parry

Citations in the corpus

• The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance (2013, background): “Lockett et al. (2009) explain resource interconnectedness as the link between the existing stock of resources and the cost of adding an increment of another resource to the firm’s stock.”
• An examination of e-HRM as a means to increase the value of the HR function (2011, background): “The RBV defines the firm as a historically determined collection of resources (Wernerfelt 1984 ; Lockett, Thompson and Morgenstern 2009 ) that are valuable, rare, inimitable and imperfectly substitutable (Barney 1991 ) and are the main source of an organisation's competitive advantage (Bowman and”
• Insights and New Directions from Demand-Side Approaches to Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Research (2012, background): “One important area of consensus is that the value of a firm’s resources is determined exogenously to the RBV (e.g., Kraaijenbrink, Spender, & Groen, 2010; Lockett et al., 2009; Priem & Butler, 2001a, 2001b).”
• Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth (2015, background): “Re-thinking the functionality of resources, and re-combining resources, may provide important new opportunities (Lockett et al., 2009).”
• What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management (2009, neutral): “It is a theory to explain how some firms are able to earn super-profits in equilibrium and, as such, it is essentially a static view (Barney 2001a,b; Priem and Butler 2001; Lockett et al. 2009).”
• Is there a bigger and better future for employer branding? Facing up to innovation, corporate reputations and wicked problems in SHRM (2011, background): “However, value creation through internal resources is not easily achieved, especially inimitability, because resources have to be specific to firms and under their control, at least on a semi-permanent basis (Lockett, Thompson and Morgenstern 2009 ).”
• The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques (2010, background): “Lockett et al. (2009) and Priem and Butler (2001a, 2001b) argue the RBV does not contain the law-like generalizations that must be expected.”
• HRM and Performance – The Role of Talent Management as a Transmission Mechanism in an Emerging Market Context (2018, neutral): “Lockett et al. (2009) posit that managers fail to understand the potential of the resources at their disposal, therefore emphasising the centrality of HRM expertise and their role in resource optimisation to further the strategic goals of the organisation (Jeong and Choi, 2015).”