Commitment across cultures: A meta-analytical approach

By Ronald Fischer, A. Mansell. 2009

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0812c0f01111c3f8f80f3762b2db76d608dbefa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Standardization in psychological research. (2010, unknown): “If we were to compare commitment scores of Japanese and U.S. workers, we may not find a significant difference, although behavioural indicators suggest a much higher level of commitment of Japanese workers (see Fischer & Mansell, 2009 for an overview of this literature).”
Work values, job satisfaction and organizational commitment in China (2012, background): “individualism, work ethics, and locus of control) have been shown to be correlated with affective commitment (Meyer and Allen 1991; Fischer and Mansell 2009).”
The Effects of Values, Work Centrality, and Organizational Commitment on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs (2013, background): “In a meta-analysis of the OC literature, Fischer and Mansell (2009) have revealed that normative commitment was higher in collectivistic settings and that continuance commitment was not clearly differentiated from other types of commitment in more hierarchical contexts.”
Understanding Affective Organizational Commitment (2011, background): “Much of this research argues organizations can be immensely important to individuals, but that individuals ultimately vary in their commitment to organizations (Fischer & Mansell, 2009; Mathieu & Zajac, 1990; Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, & Topolnytsky, 2002; Romzek, 1990).”
Teachers’ Commitment and psychological well-being: implications of self-beliefs for teaching in Hong Kong (2015, background): “Cross-cultural research has shown that normative commitment is more salient in collectivist and/or high power distance cultures (Fischer & Mansell, 2009; Hofstede, 2001; Meyer et al., 2012) such as Hong Kong while affective commitment is more salient in more individualistic cultures.”
A Comparative Study of Green Purchase Intention between Korean and Chinese Consumers: The Moderating Role of Collectivism (2017, result): “In addition to the results of studies concerning the importance of collectivism as a significant variable in predicting consumer behaviour in Asian countries, numerous studies found that collectivism increases the psychological benefits derived from selecting products which meet social preferences [”
Is Transformational Leadership Universal? A Meta-Analytical Investigation of Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Means Across Cultures (2011, methodology): “An issue in using cross-cultural meta-analysis is the nesting of studies within countries (e.g., Fischer & Mansell, 2009), which affects standard errors but not effect sizes (Kenny, Kashy, & Bolger, 1998).”