Employee Adjustment to an Organizational Merger: An Intergroup Perspective
By D. Terry, Craig J. Carey, Victor Callan. 2001
251 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be8c73a15a38055bfd34e532569af26d297b86c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- N. Ellemers
- S. A. Haslam
- Jukka Lipponen
- Minna Moilanen
- S. Cartwright
- Rolf van Dick
- M. Healey
- R. Crisp
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- S. A. Haslam
- Rolf van Dick
- N. Ellemers
- A. Rafferty
- Nikolai Egold
- Frank Drzensky
- M. Healey
- Jukka Lipponen
In Sociology and Political Science
- Rolf van Dick
- S. A. Haslam
- N. Ellemers
- R. Crisp
- Nikolai Egold
- Minna Moilanen
- S. Cartwright
- Claire E. Ashton-James
Citations in the corpus
- Perceived procedural justice and employee responses to an organizational merger (2004, background): “these studies have shown that employee identification with the new organization is a critical factor contributing to the success of the merger (Terry et al., 2001). For instance, a study by Terry et al. (2001) showed that strong identification was related to reduced ingroup bias and high levels of o”
- Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Moderating Role of Ingroup Identification (2005, result): “It has recently been suggested that motivations to retain a distinctive social identity may provide an explanation for these divergent findings (see Hornsey & Hogg, 2000; see also Terry et al., 2001).”
- MY JOB IS MY CASTLE: IDENTIFICATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXTS (2005, background): “In the following study on 365 pilots and engineers of two airlines after a merger the results of the first study could be confirmed (Terry et al., 2001).”
- Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning (2008, background): “Previous research shows that identification with a new superordinate organizational identity will be stronger when team members perceive boundaries between subgroups as permeable (Ellemers et al. 1990; Terry et al. 2001).”