Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking.

By R. Goffin, Allison C. Boyd. 2009

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbcf832d32ea5cbe59c0c529f570de871c7e5202

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Simonet
2. R. Tett
3. Jill E. Ellingson
4. Richard L. Griffith
5. Mitchell H. Peterson
6. Matthew S. O’Connell
7. Phillip M. Mangos
8. Joshua A. Isaacson

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Mitchell H. Peterson
2. Matthew S. O’Connell
3. Phillip M. Mangos
4. Joshua A. Isaacson
5. Lynn A. McFarland
6. Richard L. Griffith
7. Jill E. Ellingson
8. R. Tett

In Social Psychology

1. Richard L. Griffith
2. Mitchell H. Peterson
3. Matthew S. O’Connell
4. Phillip M. Mangos
5. Joshua A. Isaacson
6. Lynn A. McFarland
7. Jill E. Ellingson
8. R. Tett

Citations in the corpus

• Applicant Faking, Social Desirability, and the Prediction of Counterproductive Work Behaviors (2011, background): “a recent theoretical model of applicant faking, Goffin and Boyd (2009) noted that personality variables like integrity, in addition to a variable the authors referred to as “moral code,” may influence faking motivation.”
• Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory (2011, background): “Although references to motivation are common in the faking literature (e.g., Ellingson, Sackett, & Connelly, 2007; Goffin & Boyd, 2009; Hough & Oswald, 2008; Snell, Sydell, & Lueke, 1999), including a few specific references to VIE theory (Bott, Snell, Dahling, & Smith, 2010; McFarland & Ryan,…”
• Faking in Personality Assessment: A “Multisaturation” Perspective on Faking as Performance (2011, methodology): “Several models of response distortion, faking in particular, have been offered as frameworks for answering such questions (e.g., Goffin & Boyd, 2009; Marcus, 2009; McFarland & Ryan, 2000, 2006; Snell, Sydell, & Lueke, 1999; Zickar & Robie, 1999).”