Group Citizenship Behaviour Conceptualization and Preliminary Tests of its Antecedents and Consequences

By Xiao-ping Chen, Simon S. K. Lam, Stefanie E. Naumann, J. Schaubroeck. Management and Organization Review, 2005

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5a631e73807da6f4a9fb7b820f751daae4b7f26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Isabelle Galois
2. Pascal Paillé
3. William H. Bommer
4. Andrew Li
5. Russell S. Cropanzano
6. L. Bourdeau
7. R. S. Rubin
8. Arnold B. Bakker

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Andrew Li
2. Isabelle Galois
3. Pascal Paillé
4. William H. Bommer
5. Russell S. Cropanzano
6. Erich C. Dierdorff
7. L. Bourdeau
8. R. S. Rubin

Citations in the corpus

• Does prevalence mitigate relevance? The moderating effect of group-level OCB on employee performance. (2007, background): “Group-level OCB and group-level performance have been shown to be positively associated (Chen et al., 2005; Ehrhart et al., 2006).”
• Fairness at the Group Level: Justice Climate and Intraunit Justice Climate (2009, methodology): “One of the most commonly used procedural justice scales was developed by Colquitt (2001). The original instrument was developed for individuallevel analyses, although it has been adopted for the unit level in several studies. We have presented it in our Appendix. Both Colquitt et al. (2002) and Spel”
• Support, trust, satisfaction, intent to leave and citizenship at organizational level (2010, background): “Since the research of Chen et al. (1998), a number of studies have provided data on the association between OCBs and intention to leave the organization (Chen et al., 2005; Coyne and Ong, 2007; Wayne et al., 1997).”