Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game

By Robert Kurzban, Daniel Houser. 2001

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2cd21d7bd30d31a15334bf6fe6f65f99b26677d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Cooperation under the threat of expulsion in a public goods experiment (2005, background): “That emerging literature, including Andreoni (1988), Offerman, Sonnemans and Schram (1996), Fischbacher, Gächter and Fehr (2001), Kurzban and Houser (2001), Ahn, Ostrom and Walker (2002), Gunnthordottir et al. (2002), and Casari and Plott (2003), makes allowances for the presence of more than one…”
The Ecology of Collective Action: A Public Goods and Sanctions Experiment with Controlled Group Formation (2007, result): “…are thus yi,f = (10 – Ci) + (0.4)Σj Cj - (0.25)Σj Rij - Σj Rji (5) 15 The set up is identical to the treatments in BPP and PPU with punishment and without communication or endogenous group formation, and is the same as in FG except that (a) in our experiment, the cost of punishment to the punisher…”
Personality, Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty–Humility (2012, background): “Also, large individual differences in PGG contributions and cooperation in social dilemmas in general have been confirmed (Balliet, Parks, & Joireman, 2009; Kocher et al., 2008; Kurzban & Houser, 2001).”
Personality accounts for stable preferences and expectations across a range of simple games (2011, background): “Finally, Kurzban and Houser (2001) reported non-significant associations between Big Five personality traits and social preferences. Further studies have examined variation in social preferences using personality frameworks other than the five-factor model. For example, Boone, De Brabander, and van ”
Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. (2005, background): “K.J. Haley, D.M.T. Fessler / Evolution and Human Behavior 26 (2005) 245–256 253 laboratory settings (Kurzban & Houser, 2001) and likely has similar consequences in the real world.”
Conditional Cooperation and Climate Change (2014, background): “Previous work on gender differences in public goods games is inconclusive (Brown-Kruse & Hummels, 1993), though Kurzban and Houser (2001) find that women are more likely to be conditional cooperators than men, and men are more likely to be unilateral cooperators than women.”
The Experimetrics of Public Goods: Inferring Motivations from Contributions (2005, background): “Ledyard (1995) for example, reads the literature as supporting a qualified free-rider hypothesis, with subjects learning to be selfishly rational in repeated games.”
Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry and Efficiency (2005, unknown): “For work along these lines see Andreoni (1995), Falk et al. (2001), Palfrey and Prisbrey (1997) and Kurzban and Houser (2001).”
Overbidding and Heterogeneous Behavior in Contest Experiments (2013, unknown): “Also, it is well documented that subjects have different personality traits, such as the Big Five personality characteristics (Kurzban and Houser, 2001; Borghans et al., 2008), and different cognitive abilities, as measured by IQ and SAT scores (Frey and Detterman, 2004).”
Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences (2012, background): “6 The relation between personality measures and other-regarding, prosocial behavior has been studied in public goods games (Fleming and Zizzo, 2011; Kurzban and Houser, 2001; Perugini et al., 2010; Skatova and Ferguson, 2011; Volk et al., 2011), dictator games (Ben-Ner et al.”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “…are not entirely robust and null-findings have also been reported (Brocklebank, Lewis, & Bates, 2011; Evans & Revelle, 2008; Hirsh & Peterson, 2009; Kurzban & Houser, 2001; Lönnqvist, Verkasalo, & Walkowitz, 2011; Müller & Schwieren, 2012; for a recent review on the relation between behavior in…”