The Experimetrics of Public Goods: Inferring Motivations from Contributions
By Nicholas Bardsley, P. Moffatt. 2005
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e299db0e35ff3cec6b6e9fa7867241c9e23eda1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Simon Gächter
- Urs Fischbacher
- S. Gaechter
- E Elisabet Rutström
- Simone Quercia
- Glenn W. Harrison
- Ernst Fehr
- Armin Falk
In General Decision Sciences
- Glenn W. Harrison
- E Elisabet Rutström
- Simon Gächter
- S. Gaechter
- Urs Fischbacher
- Simone Quercia
- Nathaniel T. Wilcox
- Bruno S. Frey
In Safety Research
- Urs Fischbacher
- S. Gaechter
- Simon Gächter
- Glenn W. Harrison
- E Elisabet Rutström
- Ernst Fehr
- Armin Falk
- Simone Quercia
Citations in the corpus
- The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments (2012, background): “(2001), Burlando and Guala (2005), Kurzban and Houser (2005), Chaudhuri and Paichayontvijit (2006), Bardsley and Moffatt (2007), Kocher, et al. (2008), Muller, et al. (2008), Duffy and Ochs (2009), Grimm and Mengel (2009), Herrmann and Thöni (2009), and Thöni, et al. (2009) for recent studies which ”
- Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral (2009, methodology): “7 Additional applications of mixture models to experimental data include Stahl (1996, 1998), Haruvy et al. (2001), Hurley and Shogren (2005), Andersen et al. (2006a, 2006b, 2008), Bardsley and Moffatt (2007) , Bruhin et al. (2007), Conte et al. (2007), and Harrison et al. (2005).”
- Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications (2006, background): “Ockenfels (1999), Bardsley and Moffatt (2005), Burlando and Guala (2005), Muller et al. (2005), Ones and Putterman (forthcoming) and Page, Putterman and Unel (2005) also find evidence for heterogeneous cooperation preferences in related experimental designs.”