Personality, Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty–Humility

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tracing the Path from Personality — via Cooperativeness — to Conservation (2013, background): “The latter tendency, in turn, is exactly what HH fundamentally comprises (Ashton & Lee, 2005, 2008b; Hilbig & Zettler, 2009; Hilbig et al., 2012), and we therefore expected that individuals high in HH would show more ecological behaviour.”
Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality (2016, background): “For example, in line with Hilbig and Zettler (2009) and Hilbig et al. (2012), the success of high versus low honesty–humility individuals could be observed in economic games that vary in the degree to which antisocial behaviors can be punished.”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, unknown): “…have consistently been related to fairness and nonexploitation in economic games (Baumert et al., 2013; Hilbig, Glöckner, & Zettler, 2014; Hilbig et al., 2012; Hilbig, Thielmann, Hepp, Klein, & Zettler, 2015; Hilbig, Thielmann, Wührl, & T hi s do cu m en t is co py ri gh te d by th e A…”
The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors (2014, result): “Consistent with their hypothesis, Hilbig et al. (2012) found that proposers’ active cooperation (n = 198) was correlated with H (.25, p < .01) but not with A (.11, ns), whereas responders’ reactive cooperation (n = 212) was correlated with A (.19, p < .01) but not with H (-.01, ns).5 These results…”