Alternative Perspectives of Responsible Leadership

By David A. Waldman, Benjamin M. Galvin. 2008

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1dcbfeaf501d9a370afd42d767615d123420330

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Theoretical Development and Empirical Examination of a Three-Roles Model of Responsible Leadership (2019, unknown): “The common denominator in conceptualizations and definitions of responsible leadership is accountability to different stakeholder groups (Doh and Quigley 2014; Maak and Pless 2006; Waldman and Galvin 2008).”
Exploring the Impact of Responsible Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Leadership Identity Perspective (2019, background): “Responsible leadership is concerned with CSR or extended stakeholder management where leaders live up to their responsibilities [36,37].”
An Empirical Study of Leader Ethical Values, Transformational and Transactional Leadership, and Follower Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Responsibility (2011, background): “…throughout the leadership process, the ethical implications thereof, and far less attention to the leader's self-enhancement needs and shareholder expectations, is reflected in current study on ethical leadership (Knights and O'Leary, 2006) and responsible leadership (Waldman and Galvin, 2008).”
The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance (2017, background): “…positive forms of leadership theories and constructs, such as authentic leadership (Luthans & Avolio, 2003), ethical leadership (Brown, Treviño, & Harrison, 2005), leader behavioral integrity (Simons, 2002), responsible leadership (Waldman & Galvin, 2008), and spiritual leadership (Fry, 2003).”
Responsible Leadership: A Mapping of Extant Research and Future Directions (2015, background): “, Friedman 1970, 2007; Friedman and Friedman 2002), and converging views (e.g., Porter and Kramer 2006;Waldman and Galvin 2008;Waldman and Siegel 2008).”
The Relationship Between Responsible Leadership and Organisational Commitment and the Mediating Effect of Employee Turnover Intentions: An Empirical Study with Australian Employees (2017, unknown): “By aligning with a responsible approach to leadership, followers are able to gain membership to the ‘in’ group (e.g. Waldman and Galvin 2008), thus increasing the loyalty and attachment to the responsible leader and the organisation.”