Idiosyncratic Deals and Organizational Commitment.
By Thomas W. H. Ng, D. Feldman. 2010
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b16bd28df04c6ccb39bf44514a7c9b98c153352b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- J. Kammeyer-Mueller
- Russell E. Johnson
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Christopher C. Rosen
- Arnold B. Bakker
- D. L. Ferris
- D. Feldman
- Chu-Hsiang (Daisy) Chang
In Gender Studies
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- D. Feldman
- T. Judge
- P. M. Bal
- Paul G. W. Jansen
- J. Kammeyer-Mueller
- S. D. de Jong
- Arnold B. Bakker
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- P. M. Bal
- Paul G. W. Jansen
- D. Feldman
- H. Zacher
- Russell E. Johnson
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Christopher C. Rosen
Citations in the corpus
- Goal striving, idiosyncratic deals, and job behavior (2016, background): “For instance, Ng and Feldman (2010, 2012) examined employees’ expectations of idiosyncratic arrangements from their employers and found that those expectations affected their organizational commitment.”
- Core Self-Evaluations (2012, background): “Moreover, Ng and Feldman (2010) found support for the opposite prediction—that is, low-CSE individuals benefitted most from favorable conditions.”
- Idiosyncratic Deals and Voice Behavior (2015, background): “Consistent with other researchers (Hornung et al., 2008; Ng & Feldman, 2010b), we are interested in employees’ overall perceptions of i-deals, that is, the indivisible amalgam of both the distinctiveness and the level of resources offered.”
- Motivating Employees to Work Beyond Retirement: A Multi‐Level Study of the Role of I‐Deals and Unit Climate (2012, background): “…negotiates with the employee a certain arrangement, and in return, the employee becomes more attached to the organization (Hornung et al., 2008; Ng and Feldman, 2009), has a more favourable relationship with the organization (Rousseau et al., 2009), and contributes to a higher degree (Hornung…”
- Implications of core self-evaluations for a changing organizational context (2011, background): “Although not shown in themodel, it is also possible, of course, that in some cases core self-evaluations act as a moderator variable (Ng & Feldman, 2010; Tsaousis, Nikolaou, Serdaris, & Judge, 2007).”