The Psychology of Own Versus Others’ Treatment: Self-Oriented and Other-Oriented Effects on Perceptions of Procedural Justice

By K. van den Bos, E. Lind. 2001

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8d15a850c357c6c2b9cfb429e6124a3a4ed2a23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism (2018, background): “…Grewal, & Goodstein, 2005; Wagner, Lutz, & Weitz, 2009) to argue that the effects of CSR (sequentially on perceptions of organizational prestige, pride, and identification) would be strongest when CSR perceptions and overall justice perceptions are consistent (see also Van den Bos & Lind, 2001).”
The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes (2010, background): “Justice researchers find that different levels of equity beliefs within groups (e.g., entitleds dispersed with others) causes negative affective reactions and decreased member motivation to perform group roles (Colquitt, 2004; Grienberger, Rutte, & van Knippenberg, 1997; van den Bos & Lind, 2001).”
The Role of Instrumental and Expressive Social Ties in Employees' Perceptions of Organizational Justice (2003, unknown): “These articles go beyond viewing coworkers as mere referents and explore the ways in which coworkers play a prominent role in the social development and transmission of justice perceptions (e.g., DeGoey 2000, Folger and Kass 2000, van den Bos and Lind 2001, Wesolowski and Mossholder 1997).”
The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences. (2007, unknown): “Research has demonstrated that when other people’s justice perceptions are high, the relationship between one’s own justice and individual outcomes is stronger (Colquitt, 2004; Grienberger, Rutte, & van Knippenberg, 1997; van den Bos & Lind, 2001).”
Understanding Judgments of Fairness in a Real-World Political Context: A Test of the Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning (2002, background): “…to be a determinant of perceived political legitimacy (Tyler, Casper, & Fisher, 1989), obedience to the law (Tyler, 1990), and predicts how people reason about fairness regardless of whether they are the direct recipient or a third party perceiver of procedural treatment (Van den Bos & Lind, 2001).”
Management commitment to the ecological environment and employees: Implications for employee attitudes and citizenship behaviors (2015, background): “For example, van den Bos and Lind (2001), in a series of two experiments, showed that when a focal individual was treated with due process, namely by receiving opportunities for voice and being subject to a correct procedure, they became more sensitive to how hypothetical others in the same…”
DOES ACTIVATING JUSTICE HELPORHURT IN PROMOTING FORGIVENESS (2005, background): “In fact, this research shows that people are concerned not only with how fairly they are treated themselves, but people are also very much concerned with how others are being treated (LaTour, 1978; Van den Bos & Lind, 2001 ).”
Consistency Matters! How and When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Employees’ Organizational Identification? (2016, background): “Experimental research in social psychology (outside the work context) lends support to the idea that an individual reacts better to another fairness experience when he or she is treated fairly (van den Bos and Lind, 2001).”
Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions (2011, unknown): “Recent studies have shown that people care about how others are treated—unjust treatment others receive can have a significant impact on people's own evaluations of the fairness of procedures (Van den Bos & Lind, 2001).”