Consistency Matters! How and When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Employees’ Organizational Identification?

By K. De Roeck, Assâad El akremi, V. Swaen. 2016

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/661c83cac7c3c0579de03cffd54b100dda94e58f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Workplace Health Promotion, Employee Wellbeing and Loyalty during Covid-19 Pandemic—Large Scale Empirical Evidence from Hungary (2021, background): “Due to the market and profit-oriented approaches, it can be easily forgotten that corporate image and performance should not be evaluated only through financial performance or profit (Stojanovic et al. 2020; De Roeck et al. 2016).”
Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, background): “In turn, they experience greater job satisfaction (De Roeck et al., 2016), exude higher levels of organizational commitment (Ali et al., 2010; Brammer et al., 2007), and engage more in organizational citizenship behaviors (Bode et al., 2015; Hansen et al., 2011).”
The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review (2017, background): “Although the vast majority of microlevel CSR studies rely on social identity as an explanatory framework, only a small set of contributions actually test whether identification is the underlying mechanism that links CSR to outcomes (e.g., De Roeck et al., 2016; Farooq et al., 2016).”
Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism (2018, background): “For example, De Roeck, Akremi, and Swaen (2016) invoke cue consistency theory (Anderson, 1981; Maheswaran & Chaiken, 1991; Miyazaki, Grewal, & Goodstein, 2005; Wagner, Lutz, & Weitz, 2009) to argue that the effects of CSR (sequentially on perceptions of organizational prestige, pride, and…”
Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, methodology): “…have conceptualized and evaluated the role of social exchange (El Akremi et al., 2018 [Study 7]; Farooq et al., 2014), social identification (De Roeck et al., 2016) and signalling (Jones et al., 2014) in peoples’ responses to CSR. Finally, a growing body of research is devoted to clarifying…”