Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate
By M. Gavin, David Hofmann. 2002
204 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a87580e363ad0c2fc9cfe70ef0e75808ddd8b3a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- T. Scandura
- Weichun Zhu
- T. W. Lee
- Ritu Agarwal
- Dong Liu
- José María Peiró
- Aaron C. H. Schat
- Fred Walumbwa
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Aaron C. H. Schat
- Greg J. Sears
- Carlo Odoardi
- Weichun Zhu
- James A. Taylor
- Thomas Goetz
- T. W. Lee
- Ute Zaepernick-Rothe
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Fred Walumbwa
- Bradley L Kirkman
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Weichun Zhu
- John Antonakis
- B. Schyns
- D. Day
Citations in the corpus
- When Employees Are Out of Step with Coworkers: How Job Satisfaction Trajectory and Dispersion Influence Individual- and Unit-Level Voluntary Turnover (2012, methodology): “…any differences in the results between different centering methods, we also tested Hypotheses 2a and 3 using grand mean centering; consistently with Gavin and Hofmann (2002), we found the HGLM coefficients for the cross-level moderating effects were virtually identical. tion trajectory are…”
- Transformational leadership and commitment: A multilevel analysis of group-level influences and mediating processes (2010, background): “As stated earlier, perceptions of a leader within a group should cluster for several reasons (Ehrhart, 2004; Gavin & Hofmann, 2002; Griffin &Mathieu, 1997).”
- Leadership and individual differences: At the cusp of a renaissance (2012, background): “Because individuals are usually nested under higher-level entities (e.g., followers under leaders, leaders under organizations, etc.) researchers often estimate what are known as HLM-type models (cf. Gavin & Hofmann, 2002; Hofmann, 1997) like random-effects/intercepts models.”
- A hierarchical interannual wheat yield and grain protein prediction model using spectral vegetative indices and meteorological data (2020, background): “The phenomenon of hierarchical levels of grouped data occurs widely, and HLM models are frequently used in the social work (Gavin, 2002), education (Bock, 2014), and geoscience (Banerjee et al., 2014).”
- Developing and Leveraging Human Capital Resource to Promote Service Quality (2016, methodology): “…before testing these cross-level effects, we estimated a null model where we partitioned the variance in senior frontline–rated service quality into its within and between components as a necessary precondition when testing variables at different levels (gavin & Hofmann, 2002; Hofmann, 1997).”