The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
By H. Cooper, L. Hedges, J. Valentine. 2009
3,428 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The chapter on stochastically dependent effect sizes by Gleser and Olkin (2009) in The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.) describes. Download Here: tinyurl.com/ohnxrcn When the first edition of The Handbook of Research. In book: Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology A meta-analysis is literally an analysis of analyses, but conventionally the term.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7719595001266bbd6515697b953f4c640f1d7cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Carlton J. Fong
- A. Dent
- Alison C. Koenka
- Soyeon Ahn
- Chiungjung Huang
- L. Gaertner
- Bryan G. Cook
- Brian Reichow
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- Georgia Salanti
- Carlton J. Fong
- A. Chaimani
- Narayankripa Sundararajan
- Chiungjung Huang
- C. Rudolph
- J. Polanin
In Statistics and Probability
- Georgia Salanti
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- J. Polanin
- Douglas G. Altman
- A. Chaimani
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- Karel G. M. Moons
- G. Banks
Citations in the corpus
- A review of the population dynamics of mule deer and black‐tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus in North America (2013, methodology): “We examined effect size for bias across studies by regressing calculated effect size against sample size and the length of the study in years (Cooper et al. 2009).”
- Social identification and depression: A meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “Because of the broad variety of the methods and characteristics of the samples in the 76 included studies, the estimation of the average effect was based on a random-effects model, in accordance with current best practices in the field (Cooper et al., 2009).”
- Advancing Theory by Assessing Boundary Conditions With Metaregression: A Critical Review and Best-Practice Recommendations (2018, methodology): “The following equation (e.g., Raudenbush, 2009; Viechtbauer, López-López, SánchezMeca, & Marín-Martínez, 2015) describes the extent to which boundary conditions x predict the relation between two variables, as indexed by the effect size y, in a sample of k studies: y B B x B x u ei i j ij i i= + +…”
- Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. (2013, background): “The study quality was defined as the fit between the goals of the study, its design, and implementation (Valentine, 2009).”
- Do youth employment programs improve labor market outcomes? A quantitative review (2019, methodology): “In such cases, the standard deviation of the outcome variable is approximated using the formula from Borenstein et al. (2009b) (4) 𝑆𝑆𝑝𝑝 = 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 ∗ � nc∗nt nc+nt where SE is the Standard Error of a means test (e.g. standard error of the regression coefficient estimate).”
- A motivational hierarchy within: primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self? (2012, methodology): “Similarly, we convert the odds ratio (OR) for frequency data to d following Cooper et al. (2009): d= [ln(OR)√3]/π. family member, friend, romantic partner, or a religious relationship with God or Jesus Christ.”
- Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs on Educational Outcomes in Developing Countries (2012, neutral): “Universe of generalization The most important decision in choosing the method for statistical inference in meta-analysis is the universe to which the study aims to generalize (Cooper et al., 2009).”
- A Meta-Analysis of Morphological Interventions in English: Effects on Literacy Outcomes for School-Age Children (2013, background): “Publication bias often arises when the publication status depends on the statistical significance of study results (Sutton, 2009).”