A motivational hierarchy within: primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self?

By L. Gaertner, Constantine Sedikides, M. Luke, Erin M. O’Mara, Jonatham Iuzzini, L. Jackson, Huajian Cai, Q. Wu. 2012

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The individual self, relational self, and collective self are important and meaningful aspects of identity. However, they plausibly differ in their relative importance such that one self lies closer to the motivational core of the self-concept, better represent the “home base” of selfhood, or, simply stated, is motivationally primary. Four multi-method studies tested the relative motivational-primacy of the selves. Despite their disparate methods, the studies yielded consistent evidence of a three-tiered hierarchy with the individual self at the top, followed by the relational self, and trailed at the bottom by the collective self. The same hierarchy emerged in the Eastern culture of China and the Western cultures of the US and UK. Such pancultural consistency suggests that the motivational hierarchy is a fundamental pattern of the human self.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4a962ac4f27b48ea2d66470c008a5e11b7f2383

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem (2015, result): “Although Gaertner et al. (2008) showed links among self-enhancement, attribute personal importance, and psychological health, their results were On the Panculturality of Self-enhancement and Self-protection Motivation 217”