Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective.

By Carsten K. W. De Dreu. 2007

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4e29012e00742bbe147305e261fb52c2b813175

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Social Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning (2019, methodology): “Team goals have been shown to promote open-mindedness when they are cooperative, which leads to improved problem solving on teams (Tjosvold et al., 2004)—though not always (de Dreu, 2007), leaving room for further research on its influence on team learning.”
‘I’m busy (and competitive)!’ Antecedents of knowledge sharing under pressure (2014, background): “At the team level, perceived cooperative outcome interdependence relates significantly to information sharing (De Dreu, 2007), and cooperative rewards systems can encourage knowledge sharing (e.g., Ferrin & Dirks, 2003; Quigley et al, 2007).”
When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team (2016, background): “According to MIP-G theory, such motivation drives information search and sharing (De Dreu, 2007; De Dreu et al., 2008).”
Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis (2008, background): “Moreover, in a recent study by De Dreu (2007), a weak correlation was found between team size and the measured outcomes of learning (r = .15) and team effectiveness (r = .16).”
An Exploratory Study of Group Development and Team Learning (2015, background): “…behaviors lead to the building of mutually shared cognition and to increased team effectiveness (e.g., Edmondson, 1999; Edmondson et al., 2001; De Dreu, 2007; Savelsbergh et al., 2008; Van den Bossche et al., 2006; Van Offenbeek, 2001; Van Woerkom & Croon, 2009; Zellmer-Bruhn & Gibson, 2006).”
Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams (2015, methodology): “In this sense, RIP involves thinking deeply with others resulting in more extensive real-time search and exploration, compared with a less effortful means of information processing of using heuristics or relying on past experiences (Chaiken and Trope, 1999; De Dreu, 2007).”
A functional model of hierarchy (2011, background): “Organizational members are often interdependent in their outcomes (i.e., subjected to a common fate; Campbell, 1958; De Dreu, 2007).”
Seeing the "We" in "Me" Sports: The Need to Consider Individual Sport Team Environments (2012, neutral): “…interdependence (i.e., the more I get, the more you get; non zero-sum) is comparable with a cooperative setting and is associated with prosocial motives, greater responsibility for others’ work, and improved individuallevel outcomes (De Dreu, 2007; Van der Vegt, Emans, & Van de Vliert, 1998).”