A Typology of the Idea of Learning Organization

By Anders Örtenblad. 2002

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0651d37a7806416516796d19913ed17ab829cd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ji Hoon Song
2. B. Joo
3. Baiyin Yang
4. S. Bae
5. Junhee Kim
6. D. Chai
7. T. Egan
8. K. Bartlett

In Strategy and Management

1. Ji Hoon Song
2. S. Bae
3. Junhee Kim
4. D. Chai
5. Baiyin Yang
6. B. Joo
7. Karen E. Watkins
8. Victoria J. Marsick

Citations in the corpus

• The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: A critical review (2012, background): “…an increasing number of reviews of the field (e.g. Argote, 2011; Corresponding author: Paul Tosey, Surrey Business School, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK Email: p.tosey@surrey.ac.uk Easterby-Smith and Lyles, 2003; Easterby-Smith et al., 1999; Örtenblad, 2002; Shipton, 2006).”
• The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation (2004, background): “In a recent comprehensive review of literature on learning organizations, Örtenblad (2002) developed a typology of the idea of a learning organization .”
• Job Performance in the Learning Organization: The Mediating Impacts of Self‐Efficacy and Work Engagement (2018, background): “…Performance Improvement Quarterly frames including organizational learning, workplace learning, learning climate, and learning structure perspective (Örtenblad, 2002 ); and (c) allows researchers to conceptualize the link between the learning-organization culture and the behavioral performance of…”
• The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention (2004, background): “Örtenblad (2002) reviewed twelve perspectives of learning organization and revealed that Watkins and Marsick’s approach (1993) is the only theoretical framework that covers most idea areas of the concept in the literature.”
• Predictors of organizational commitment in India: strategic HR roles, organizational learning capability and psychological empowerment (2007, background): “1970s Pareek and Rao (1981) Professional and Legalistic Era HRD Department in Larsen and Tubro 1970s Amba-Rao (1994); Sparrow and Budhwar (1997); Rao (1992); Saiyadain (1990); Balasubramanian (1995); Budhwar (2000); Budhwar and Sparrow (1998); Parikh and Garg (1990) IIPM and NILM merged to form Nati”
• Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance (2005, background): “Ortenblad (2002) notes that only a few authors (Argyris, 1999; DiBella, 1995; Easterby-Smith & Araujo, 1999) have attempted to create learning organization typologies.”
• The Significance of Workplace Learning for Individuals, Groups and Organisations (2007, methodology): “Ortenblad (2002) derived a typology of the idea of a learning organisation from a detailed textual analysis of a wide range of literature published by 12 authors during the l990s, which he interpreted in terms of four distinct types of understanding.”
• Leadership Style and Organizational Learning: The Mediate Effect of School Vision. (2010, methodology): “The conceptual framework for this study is rooted in the current organizational learning literature (Pedler, 1996; Lipshitz et al., 2006; Ortenblad, 2002; Argyris and Schon, 1978; Senge, 1990), on the theory of transformational leadership (Bass, 1985; Burns, 1978) that considers vision as a key…”