The MLQ revisited: psychometric properties and recommendations

By Manuel J. Tejeda, T. Scandura, Rajnandini Pillai. 2001

471 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97c468dd41aa271abd3d81b9cd3fcceb6972115d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The impact of transformational, transactional and non-leadership styles on employee job satisfaction in the German hospitality industry (2012, background): “In addition, Tejeda et al. (2001) state that some transformational dimensions correlate with transactional and non-leadership dimensions.”
Leadership Styles and Burnout: is there an association? (2010, unknown): “The psychometric properties of the MLQ have captured the attention of many academic scholars since the instrument’s inception (Antonakis et al., 2003; Avolio et al., 1999; Carless, 1998; Den Hartog et al., 1997; Tejada et al., 2001; Yukl, 1999).”
A theoretical and empirical examination of the transactional and non-leadership dimensions of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) (2008, methodology): “All of the correlations among the four scales were within the ranges found in prior studies (Tejeda et al., 2001), which provides us with increased confidence about the generalizability of results from this sample.”
Conceptualising followership – a review of the literature (2011, methodology): “The MLQ was developed by Bass (1985) to examine not only the charismatic aspects of transformational leadership but also transactional and more ‘mundane leadership’ (Tejeda et al., 2001: 32).”
The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, psychological, and training outcomes in elite military recruits☆ (2010, background): “…others have conceptualized and measured transformational leadership as a reduced set of factors (e.g., Barling et al., 1996; Charbonneau et al., 2001; Tejeda et al., 2001), and still others have utilized a fuller factor structure (e.g., Antonakis et al., 2003; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, & Bommer, 1996).”
Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Martial Arts (2006, background): “At the same time, the factorial validity of the MLQ-5X (nine leadership scales) has to be reconfirmed (Tejeda et al., 2001).”