The use of constructive-developmental theory to advance the understanding of leadership

271 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Personality and Leadership Developmental Levels as predictors of leader performance (2009, background): “The authors join McCauley et al. (2006) in their call for longitudinal examinations of constructive-developmental theory in the study of leadership.”
Deficient Critical Thinking Skills among College Graduates: Implications for leadership (2012, background): “McCauley et al. (2006) examined constructive development in relation to leadership as they developed a taxonomy of constructive development.”
Reviewing Leadership Styles: Overlaps and the Need for a New ‘Full‐Range’ Theory (2017, unknown): “Leaders’ ego development undergoes three development stages: dependent stage, independent stage and inter-independent stage (McCauley et al. 2006).”
Managers’ Citizenship Behaviors for the Environment: A Developmental Perspective (2018, methodology): “…LDP is based on the Washington University Sentence Completion Test (WUSCT), which has been widely used in the literature since the 70s, especially in the field of developmental personality assessment (Loevinger et al. 1970; Manners and Durkin 2001; McCauley et al. 2006; Pfaffenberger et al. 2011).”