Assessing Workgroup Norms for Civility: The Development of the Civility Norms Questionnaire-Brief

By Benjamin M. Walsh, V. Magley, D. Reeves, K. Davies-Schrils, Matthew D. Marmet, Jessica A. Gallus. 2012

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/948c590fdce55290550ea219744e0f5022723e97

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Iqra Sajjad
2. Natasha Saman Elahi
3. Pauline Schilpzand
4. A. Erez
5. Asma Nisar
6. Ghulam Abid
7. I. D. Pater
8. Saira Farooqi

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. Pauline Schilpzand
2. A. Erez
3. I. D. Pater

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Pauline Schilpzand
2. I. D. Pater
3. Iqra Sajjad
4. Natasha Saman Elahi
5. A. Erez
6. Asma Nisar
7. Ghulam Abid
8. Saira Farooqi

Citations in the corpus

• Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research (2016, methodology): “Other domains that assess incivility (e.g., the group norm level and the organizational level) also show effects on theory-driven outcome variables, such as job satisfaction (Walsh et al., 2012) and turnover intentions (Griffin, 2010; Walsh et al., 2012).”
• The influence of prosocial motivation and civility on work engagement:The mediating role of thriving at work (2018, background): “Civility is not only the nonappearance of mistreatment, but it includes being politically polite (Boyd, 2006; Walsh et al., 2012).”