A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs.

By D. Zohar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000

1,567 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Medical Laboratory Technology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/942429c27c33058057ff8a043d8ace298ec0300a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Medical Laboratory Technology

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. (2006, background): “Specific types of climate reflect perceptions of different facets of the work environment, such as service (Schneider, White, & Paul, 1998), innovation (Anderson & West, 1998), and safety (Neal et al., 2000; Zohar, 1980, 2000).”
Safety in shipping: the human element. (2006, background): “One commonly used definition was proposed by Zohar (2000) , where essentially climate perceptions relate to “procedures as patterns,” whereby consistent procedures represent patterns that reflect the importance and prioritizationofsafetyovercompetinggoals.Zoharpresentsa group level model of safety ”
Assembling Fragments Into a Lens: A Review, Critique, and Proposed Research Agenda for the Organizational Work Climate Literature (2009, background): “…in that they are related to a particular aspect of the organizational context such as climates for justice (Naumann & Bennett, 2000), safety (Zohar, 2000), innovation (Anderson & West, 1998), ethics (Victor & Cullen, 1987, 1988), service (Schneider, White, & Paul, 1998), and diversity…”
How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity (2009, background): “…in particular organizational settings; for instance, studies have focused on service, ethics and a safety climate as enablers of organizational outcomes (e.g., Barling, Loughlin, & Kelloway, 2002; Grojean, Resick, Dickson, & Smith, 2004; Guldenmund, 2000; Schneider et al., 2005; Zohar, 2000, 2002).”
Developing and Leveraging Human Capital Resource to Promote Service Quality (2016, background): “Service climate stems from a pattern of organizational policies and practices and the supervisor’s modes of implementing them (Zohar, 2000), which contrasts with unit service orientation, which stems from a unit comprising individuals who have a predisposition to provide high-quality service.”
Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta-analytic review (2003, methodology): “When aggregated to the group or organization level, employee climate perceptions have been used to predict group-level outcomes such as accident rates (Zohar, 2000), customer satisfaction, and financial performance (Schneider & Bowen, 1985; Schneider, White, & Paul, 1998).”
Do Perceptions of Supervisors' Safety Responses Mediate the Relationship between Perceptions of the Organizational Safety Climate and Incident Rates in the Construction Supply Chain? (2012, positive): “The second part of the survey utilized a ten-item group safety climate scale developed by Zohar (2000).”
Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. (2009, background): “We refer the reader to Wallace and Chen (2006) and Zohar (2000, 2002b), who have highlighted methodological advantages of studying microaccidents relative to accidents.”
Safety Climate in Organizations (2016, neutral): “Microaccidents have three methodological advantages as a criterion of behavioral safety (Zohar, 2000): (a) They occur much more frequently than lost-workday accidents, resulting in a homogeneous distribution”
High-performance work systems and occupational safety. (2005, background): “…of safety incidents, namely, (a) microaccidents—those injuries that require a visit to the infirmary but do not require time off of work (e.g., Zohar, 2000, 2002), (b) near misses—incidents at work that involve safety infractions but do not result in injury—and (c) lost-time injuries—the…”
Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. (2003, background): “…we believe that safety is emphasized to at least some degree within high-risk environments, safety climate research suggests that work groups vary significantly in the degree to which safe performance is viewed as expected, rewarded, and valued (see Hofmann & Stetzer, 1996, 1998; Zohar, 2000).”