Effects of Motivational Regulation on Effort and Achievement: A Mediation Model.

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students’ Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement (2018, background): “Motivational differences between academic levels One of the factors affecting the selection of MRSs is a student’ academic level (Schwinger & Steinsmeier-Pelster, 2012).”
Which one works best? Considering the relative importance of motivational regulation strategies (2017, background): “The ability to enhance and uphold one's own motivation represents an essential feature of self-regulated learning (e.g., Sansone & Thoman, 2005; Schwinger & Stiensmeier-Pelster, 2012).”
The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning (2017, background): “Results on relations between the use of strategies and achievement are less conclusive, but some studies suggest that the relation is mediated by effort (Schwinger, Steinmayr, & Spinath, 2009; Schwinger & Stiensmeier-Pelster,2012).”
The Role of Metamotivational Monitoring in Motivation Regulation (2018, methodology): “…& Hadwin, 1998), theorists have suggested that, at the broadest level, motivation regulation comprises two reciprocal metamotivational processes (Boekaerts, 1995; Corno, 1993; Kuhl, 2000; Pintrich, 2004; Sansone & Thoman, 2005, 2006; Schwinger & Stiensmeier-Pelster, 2012; Wolters, 2003, 2011).”