HOW DIFFERENT TEAM DOWNSIZING APPROACHES INFLUENCE TEAM-LEVEL ADAPTATION AND PERFORMANCE

By D. S. Derue, John R. Hollenbeck, Michael D. Johnson, Daniel R. Ilgen, Dustin K. Jundt. 2008

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Performance Adaptation (2014, background): “…adaptive mechanisms (i.e., communication and mutual assistance). however, given that different structural manipulations have been explored (e.g., DeRue et al., 2008, investigated the effect of removing different team members), more research is needed to examine the robustness of these findings.…”
Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review (2017, background): “Extraversion should increase communication about the change (DeRue et al., 2008; Porter et al., 2003).”
Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes (2010, background): “…a variety of different types of events that impact team functioning, including but not limited to changes in team size and leadership structure (DeRue et al., 2008), changes in the team task (Harrison, Mohammed, McGrath, Florey, & Vanderstoep, 2003), and changes in the organizational…”
A Study of the Association between Level of Slack Reduction Following Downsizing and Innovation Output (2010, unknown): “However, as the level of downsizing increases so does role overload (Ashforth, 1996; DeRue et al., 2008; Maslach, 2003) until downsizing level reaches a tipping point beyond which surviving employees’ ability to carry out the day to day tasks and still be able to innovate decreases.”