Assessment of Individual Job Performance: A Review of the past Century and a Look Ahead

By C. Viswesvaran. 2001

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b44b617d6493ef4e9a2be82a841b2c2362e37d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Sharon K. Parker
2. D. L. Ferris
3. Douglas J. Brown
4. Ingo Zettler
5. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
6. Nick Turner
7. Heinz Holling
8. Gerald R. Ferris

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
2. Helen M. Williams
3. Ingo Zettler
4. Sharon K. Parker
5. Douglas J. Brown
6. D. L. Ferris
7. Nick Turner
8. G. Blickle

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Sharon K. Parker
2. Arnold B. Bakker
3. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
4. A. Rafferty
5. Nick Turner
6. Helen M. Williams
7. G. Blickle
8. Sabine Sonnentag

Citations in the corpus

• Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review (2011, background): “Each of the four dimensions are latent, meaning that they cannot be measured directly [14].”
• Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. (2006, background): “For example, much research has been devoted to investigating the predictors of standard task performance (Viswesvaran, 2001) as well as citizenship behaviors (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Paine, & Bachrach, 2000).”
• How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: a meta-analysis (2021, background): “The measurement of job performance is generally divided into objective and subjective assessments (Viswesvaran, 2001).”
• Achieving task and extra-task-related behaviors: A case of gender and position differences in the perceived role of rewards in the hotel industry (2008, background): “Employee performance is also a multidimensional construct (Viswesvaran, 2001).”
• SELF-ESTEEM AND JOB PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF SELF-ESTEEM CONTINGENCIES (2010, background): “Befitting its role as a key construct in organizational research, the antecedents of job performance have been the subject of much research (Bauer, Bodner, Erdogan, Truxillo, & Tucker, 2007; Johnson, 2003; Tett & Burnett, 2003; Viswesvaran, 2001), with theoretical models suggesting its antecedents c”
• The Impact of Change Process and Context on Change Reactions and Turnover During a Merger (2010, background): “Archival data are less vulnerable to biases associated with subjective assessments because they tap into “observable, countable, and discrete outcomes” (Viswesvaran, 2001, p. 111).”
• Personality, political skill, and job performance (2008, background): “05) which is within the normal range (Viswesvaran, 2001) of the observed inter-rater correlations.”